You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's a fundamental incompatibility between how texml and tex handle the textequation environment. Specifically, the usual tex version accepts an optional argument (which is actually mandatory if you wish to label [or tag] the textequation) whereas the texml implementation takes no such optional argument.
Here's the relevant bit of the texml implementation:1
This incompatibility means, when producing HTML, textequation produces a superfluous pair of [, ]s. As the optional argument structure is, more-or-less, necessary for the tex implementation, it'd probably be best to change the texml implementation to match.
There's a fundamental incompatibility between how
texml
andtex
handle the textequation environment. Specifically, the usualtex
version accepts an optional argument (which is actually mandatory if you wish to label [or tag] the textequation) whereas thetexml
implementation takes no such optional argument.Here's the relevant bit of the
texml
implementation:1And here's the
tex
implementation:2This incompatibility means, when producing HTML, textequation produces a superfluous pair of
[
,]
s. As the optional argument structure is, more-or-less, necessary for thetex
implementation, it'd probably be best to change thetexml
implementation to match.Footnotes
/ams/texmf/texml/lib/perl/TeX/Interpreter/Package/amsmath.pm
↩/ams/texmf/archive/texlive2016/texmf-prd/tex/latex/amscls/amsart.cfg
↩The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: