You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe that we should have the founding members be the copyright holders. but Hacknique and contributors could work when we list the main copyright holder.
Keep in mind, i still need main control over the project for at least 1 year, because its my final year project for university and it needs to be done a certain way for me to get the marks.
Also note, we would still need to add the copyright to the file of the contributors, even if its under an organization.
Flexibility
It might be worth considering a flexible approach where both individual and organizational copyright attributions are used, depending on the context and the preferences of individual contributors.
I assume that if we have an organisation now, we must use
Hacknique and contributors
as a copyright holder rather than James himself.Let me know your thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: