Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Yuukke (SA:RET:16) - Compliance check. #3190

Open
FarheenNazz opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Yuukke (SA:RET:16) - Compliance check. #3190

FarheenNazz opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@FarheenNazz
Copy link

Yuukkee SA:16

Flow-1

On_search-

  • bpp/fulfilment.id and bpp/providers.fufilment.ids should be matched.
  • bpp/providers.location.gps and area_code do not match.
  • Invalid EAN code- 0001771633887.Please check for other item_ids as well.

On_search_inc-

  • both the context.timestamp is the same for search_inc and on_search_inc?
  • No such delta changes found for the provided item_ids.Ids having some change in data should be provided in this calls.

@kanagasathish

@FarheenNazz
Copy link
Author

YUUKKE SA RET:16
Seller should send Nack for buyer issues-

Flow 1-

On_search-

  • context.timestamp- timestamp can not be same as search call.
  • bpp/providers.location.gps and area_code do not match.
  • Invalid EAN code-1469278063094.Please check for other item_ids as well.

Search_inc-

  • payment.tags and payment.settlement_details are not needed in the search incremental call.
  • payment.buyer_app_finder_fee_amount should be the same as provided in the full search call.

On_search-inc-

  • message.bpp/providers-additional fields are given like fulfillments,categories,locations etc. only item and provider id should be there in call.Refer contract.
  • bpp/provider.item.descriptor- how ean code can change for the same item id in on_search and on_search_inc call. Item id-594. (check for other item).
  • context.timestamp- timestamp can not be the same as a search_inc call.

@kanagasathish

@kanagasathish
Copy link
Contributor

Seller should send Nack for buyer issues , shall you explain what is this scenario it is for flow1

@FarheenNazz
Copy link
Author

Seller should send Nack for buyer issues , shall you explain what is this scenario it is for flow1

Hey @kanagasathish That was the general comment for the buyer side issues.(action calls)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants