You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Re #1293: we actually do need to deal with more-than-one clauses in partials, for convenience of implementing the argument of hcom. We will need to support this:
partial {
| i = j => M₁
| k = i => M₂
| k = j => M₃
}
And the type checking of this term will make sure things like i = j, k = i ⊢ M₁ = M₂.
Then, we will write partial types using a syntax of cofibration expressions. So we will need disjunctions. I don't right now see any use of conjunctions, so we do not have to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Re #1293: we actually do need to deal with more-than-one clauses in partials, for convenience of implementing the argument of
hcom
. We will need to support this:And the type checking of this term will make sure things like
i = j, k = i ⊢ M₁ = M₂
.Then, we will write partial types using a syntax of cofibration expressions. So we will need disjunctions. I don't right now see any use of conjunctions, so we do not have to do it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: