You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
proposal_delete_operation doesn't recursively check the authorities in case when multi-sig authority involved. See https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20861.msg271080.html#msg271080, it's a try to delete an incorrect committee proposal, but failed due to this reason: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception required_approvals->find(o.fee_paying_account) != required_approvals->end(): Provided authority is not authoritative for this proposal. {"provided":"1.2.12376","required":["1.2.0"]}
This operation allows the early veto of a proposed transaction. It may be used by any account which is a required authority on the proposed transaction, when that account's holder feels the proposal is ill-advised and he decides he will never approve of it and wishes to put an end to all discussion of the issue.
Imo it's better to set a threshold equals to (total_weight - approve_threshold) for proposal_delete_operation, so the proposal will only be deleted if enough authorities agree to delete the proposal.
From @abitmore on January 9, 2016 4:3
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception required_approvals->find(o.fee_paying_account) != required_approvals->end(): Provided authority is not authoritative for this proposal. {"provided":"1.2.12376","required":["1.2.0"]}
This operation allows the early veto of a proposed transaction. It may be used by any account which is a required authority on the proposed transaction, when that account's holder feels the proposal is ill-advised and he decides he will never approve of it and wishes to put an end to all discussion of the issue.
Imo it's better to set a threshold equals to (total_weight - approve_threshold) for proposal_delete_operation, so the proposal will only be deleted if enough authorities agree to delete the proposal.
Copied from original issue: cryptonomex/graphene#515
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: