You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And when submitted to my GCP Batch which is deployed in us-west1, it worked smoothly with zones overwritten by the Batch configuration.
However, in Cromwell v88, the same job triggers the following error at server side:
2025-03-11 22:41:49 cromwell-system-akka.dispatchers.engine-dispatcher-29 INFO - WorkflowManagerActor: Workflow 4257dce0-247f-45c3-9961-5f1db9bfb073 failed (during ExecutingWorkflowState): cromwell.backend.google.batch.api.BatchApiRequestManager$UserBatchApiException: Unable to complete Batch request due to a problem with the request (io.grpc.StatusRuntimeException: INVALID_ARGUMENT: job.allocation_policy field is invalid. all specified locations end up in more than one regions [us-central1 us-east1 us-west1].).
I was able to go around it by explicitly specifying zones: "us-west1-a us-west1-b us-west1-c" in my input JSON file. However, I'm still wondering if there is any way to fix it so that it works as usual.
Or is it true that since Cromwell v88, multi-regon zones value would always be considered invalid?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is due to a limitation of GCP Batch - when specifying a location for the job to run in, we can only request a region or a list of zones in a single region.
Hello,
In Cromwell v87, my workflow has the following default values for
zones
runtime attribute:And when submitted to my GCP Batch which is deployed in
us-west1
, it worked smoothly withzones
overwritten by the Batch configuration.However, in Cromwell v88, the same job triggers the following error at server side:
I was able to go around it by explicitly specifying
zones: "us-west1-a us-west1-b us-west1-c"
in my input JSON file. However, I'm still wondering if there is any way to fix it so that it works as usual.Or is it true that since Cromwell v88, multi-regon
zones
value would always be considered invalid?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: