Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bloom's Taxonomy Link Broken #488

Open
sstevens2 opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Bloom's Taxonomy Link Broken #488

sstevens2 opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
Lesson Design & Development issue related to the parts of the curriculum teaching lesson design and development skills type:bug Code included in the lesson needs to be fixed

Comments

@sstevens2
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the problem?

Vanderbuilt link broken

Location of problem (optional)

https://carpentries.github.io/lesson-development-training/instructor/objectives.html
@sstevens2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have an email into the center it redirects to.

@sstevens2 sstevens2 added the type:bug Code included in the lesson needs to be fixed label Feb 17, 2025
@tobyhodges tobyhodges added the Lesson Design & Development issue related to the parts of the curriculum teaching lesson design and development skills label Feb 20, 2025
@anenadic
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the correct Vanderbilt link should now be:
https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf

This is a link to a pdf file - possibly a link to wikipedia is more appropriate (or some third resource):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy

What do the other's think? @sstevens2 @tobyhodges

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Lesson Design & Development issue related to the parts of the curriculum teaching lesson design and development skills type:bug Code included in the lesson needs to be fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@anenadic @sstevens2 @tobyhodges