You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi,
I read the readme.md, I wonder if the "average log likelihood of the GMM given all data points" is equal to the "log-likelihood of the model"?
I wanna calculate a BIC , suppose I fit a model gmm = GMM(k,x),
then BIC = −2 * loglik + (log N ) * d. , where loglik is the log-likelihood of the model, N is the number of datapoints and d is the number of parameters in the model.
so, is it OK to using avll(gmm::GMM, x::Matrix) as the loglik here?
I am not an expert in the field of statistics, any advice is appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It has been a while since I've been working with BIC, but looking at Wikipedia, your loglik is the total log-likelihood of the model, this would be N * avll.
hi,
I read the readme.md, I wonder if the "average log likelihood of the GMM given all data points" is equal to the "log-likelihood of the model"?
I wanna calculate a BIC , suppose I fit a model
gmm = GMM(k,x)
,then
BIC = −2 * loglik + (log N ) * d.
, where loglik is the log-likelihood of the model, N is the number of datapoints and d is the number of parameters in the model.so, is it OK to using
avll(gmm::GMM, x::Matrix)
as the loglik here?I am not an expert in the field of statistics, any advice is appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: