You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Versions for Deephaven look like 0.28.0, 0.28.1, etc. That style is not lexicographical sort-able. For some queries used for generating tables using the Benchmark snippets, sorting by version is important. Sorting by timestamp is not reliable, because it's possible that a re-run of a specific release will be needed, which would put the timestamps out of order.
Write a function to convert version to something sortable
Add it inline for the version column being sorted (since benchmark data is small, this should not affect performance)
This ticket has been fulfilled by approaching the problem a different way. With the change in directory structure, all "set" level directory labels, whether version or date, are lexicographical sort-able. These are used to sort newest to oldest, Timestamp is no longer a factor in the benchmark queries. For example, concerning the nightly category, "last 5 days" means "last 5 sets". Concerning the release category, "last 5 versions" means "last 5 sets".
Versions for Deephaven look like 0.28.0, 0.28.1, etc. That style is not lexicographical sort-able. For some queries used for generating tables using the Benchmark snippets, sorting by version is important. Sorting by timestamp is not reliable, because it's possible that a re-run of a specific release will be needed, which would put the timestamps out of order.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: