-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
prunerepo and DNF5 #3615
Comments
$ dnf repoquery --repofrompath=prunerepo_query, dnf5-5.2.8.1-3.fc41.x86_64 Seems like %location / --location is still giving us an empty output. |
There's a work-around for rpm-software-management/dnf5#2048, it no longer blocks us. But we need to update the |
Needs to be build and deployed to production. |
Released: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=prunerepo copr-backend still builds fine against the new package: |
After a prior team ACK, deployed to prod. The repo pruner is running now. Going to close tomorrow. |
Hmm, the script I run manually ended after ~2hours, that is a bit too fast? Monitoring another run. |
These data show the last prunerepo starts, and when particular PIDs finished. The first Sorry for the edit. Firefox/GitHub ate my well-edited comment, and submitted previous version. |
Prunerepo still uses DNF3
https://pagure.io/prunerepo/blob/6cafec4a70f93aa87778c3dc3b96d3de7cb0de02/f/prunerepo/helpers.py#_177-179
We done that because of
https://pagure.io/prunerepo/issue/18
DNF3 is slower than DNF5, we should revisit this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: