-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Containerized workflow #936
Comments
I can do this, If its not currently being developed by anyone else @Zlopez |
@ozkanonur You can take it, nobody is working on this now |
Are we going to do the same thing here that we did for the-new-hotness? I mean we do this only for the development environment? |
Yes, this should work the same as in the-new-hotness. |
Do we need a container for "check_service"? If it's not an application and just checking things, it can be executed in web's or consumer's container. @Zlopez |
It is in it's own container in OpenShift, because it's a service that could run independently. But yes, in this case it could run in web's container. |
Description
Because release-monitoring.org is running in OpenShift it will be nice to have similar environment for development. This means using containers instead of Vagrant.
Requirements
How this will make Anitya better
This will make production env and dev env almost one to one and will allow us to reproduce issues we encounter in production much more easily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: