New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Literal predicates for BigDecimal #624

Closed

sad-fat-cat opened this issue Mar 28, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #841

sad-fat-cat commented Mar 28, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Example: https://gist.github.com/enp0s23/229b9125c4ce9912ed740e9520b31803

For BigDecimal, we can use NonNegative, but can't use literal predicates, like Greater or Interval.

This looks strange -- why we cannot apply numeric predicates to the numeric type from the standard library?

fthomas linked a pull request

that will close this issue

Allow Int and Double literals as universal arguments #841

Merged

fthomas closed this as completed in #841

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment