doc: add meeting minutes for 2017-09-13

Fixes: nodejs#875
PR-URL: nodejs#881

Author: gibfahn

doc/meetings/build-wg-meeting-2017-09-13.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+# Node.js Foundation Build WG Meeting 2017-09-12
+
+Next meeting: 2017-10-03 20:00UTC
+
+## Present
+
+* Michael Dawson (@mhdawson)
+* Gibson Fahnestock (@gibfahn)
+* Rod Vagg (@rvagg)
+* Refael Ackermann (@refack)
+* George Adams (@gdams)
+
+### When
+
+Sep 12, 2017 10 PM UTC
+
+
+### Where
+- [Youtube stream, for viewers](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oflJCk6hne0)
+- [Previous meeting](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/837)
+
+### Agenda
+
+Extracted from `wg-agenda` [issues](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Awg-agenda) and [pull requests](https://github.com/nodejs/build/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Awg-agenda+is%3Apr) from this repo.
+
+* Demo KeyBox at next WG Meeting [#806](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/806)
+* ansible: use gcc 4.9 on CentOS 6 [#809](https://github.com/nodejs/build/pull/809)
+* ansible: use gcc 4.9 on Ubuntu 14.04 [#797](https://github.com/nodejs/build/pull/797)
+
+
+## Standup
+
+Rod Vagg
+ * Usual machine fixing work
+ * Jenkins issues
+ * Reprovision macOS machine
+Refael Ackermann
+ * Help n-api addon job
+ * Some fixups on AIX
+ * Learning about pipelines
+Michael Dawson (@mhdawson)
+  * Some work to keep benchmarking jobs runs running
+  * Adding graphics for new donators
+  * Work to get ok to get Ok for George to help on Mac install, and will do bootstrap later
+     this week.
+  * Continuing to work on z/OS machine setup and ansible script
+George
+  * initial discussion with Michael on the Mac OS setup
+  * presentation on keybox, tool used in another project
+Gibson Fahnestock
+ * Maintenance on AIX machines
+ * Testing/using Ansible scripts
+ * Jenkins maintenance
+
+## Agenda
+
+
+### Demo KeyBox [#806](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/806)
+
+- George: Keybox is a really useful key management tool we’re using in AdoptOpenJDK.
+- Rod: This could really help us automate our currently manual key management.
+  setup, and it would be great to use.
+- Michael: What's the platform support?
+  - George: Anything that can run an ssh server is fine, we've got it working on
+    Windows, z/OS etc.
+- Rod: Is there a backup in case this goes wrong?
+- George: We have another root user that isn't managed by Keybox, so if it goes
+  wrong we can still use that user to log on.
+  - Gibson: Still sounds like it'd be better than our current setup.
+  - Rod: Most of our machines can be reprovisioned if there's a problem.
+- Gibson: Can you backup the config?
+  - It has a set of config files you can just backup.
+- Rod: How does it handle more complex setups, e.g. jump boxes?
+  - George: It doesn't as yet, but the devs are open to improvements (and it's
+    OSS).
+- Rod: What about user account levels?
+  - George: There are different tiers of user access.
+- Michael: What's it like for initial machine setup?
+  - George: Just provide IP/Port and Username/Password.
+- Gibson: Where should we put this?
+  - Rod: How about on one of the CI machines. Only issue is Jenkins has had many
+    security vulnerabilities.
+- Everyone: Think about where to install and comment in the issue.
+
+
+### ansible: use gcc 4.9 on CentOS 6 [#809](https://github.com/nodejs/build/pull/809)
+
+- Gibson: Same as the next one really.
+- Rod: I thought RHEL 6 stopped supporting 32-bit installations anyway, so can
+  anyone get a 32-bit version?
+- Rod: I guess the point is that 4.9 might fix some compiler bugs we'll hit
+  going forward, but of course it might not.
+- Gibson: Do we want to keep supporting 32-bit going forward? Is anyone using
+  it?
+  - Rod: http://nodejs.org/metrics, looks like it's still considerable.
+  - Gibson: But that might all just be CI.
+  - Rod: Yeah no way of knowing.
+- Gibson: Looks like the devtoolset doesn't support 32-bit.
+  - Rod: But presumably you could still build 32-bit right?
+  - Gibson: Not sure.
+- Rod: There is a trend towards dropping 32-bit. Relates to the discussion we were having about supported platforms.
+- Gibson: It'd be nice to have a way to flush out the people who are still
+  relying on it.
+  - Rod: If we were going to drop it might make more sense to drop on an
+    odd-numbered release (gives people time to complain and we could add it
+    back).
+- Gibson: What about ARM, are people running 32-bit on embedded?
+  - Rod: No, only old ARM. And I think we only have to consider Intel here.
+- Rod: Only question is Windows, but I think we're safe there too, there's no
+  32-bit support.
+- Michael: If we're going to drop on an odd number, would 9 be too soon, or
+  would 11 be the target?
+  - Rod: I think 9 might be too soon.
+  - Refael: I don't think it's too soon, it sounds like it's only people with
+    old systems.
+  - Michael: it doesn't give much time for discussion though.
+  - Rod: We did already bump the requirements, so those old systems are already
+    unsupported.
+  - Refael: Yeah they'll probably stick with an old LTS.
+- Gibson: Okay so we could try it for 9.0.0 and see who complains.
+- Michael: How much work would it be to change this?
+  - Rod: Should just be some Jenkins config work.
+  - Gibson: Shouldn't be too much, Rod did something simiilar for CentOS 6.
+  - Rod: We'd have to look at tests as well.
+  - Michael: Might need changes for the website too.
+- Gibson: We could just float it as a proposal.
+- Gibson: It'd also free up more test machines.
+  - Rod: Would be good to talk to someone who knows more about Windows.
+- Gibson: So is this PR good to land?
+  - Rod: My concern is that a devtoolset-6 binary might not work on a vanilla
+    machine. I'll test it out.
+- Gibson: I'll raise an issue to discuss 32-bit in 9.x.
+
+
+### ansible: use gcc 4.9 on Ubuntu 14.04 [#797](https://github.com/nodejs/build/pull/797)
+
+- Gibson: This one should be fine, we don't build releases on Ubuntu so it's not an
+  issue.
+  - All: No issues with this.
+
+
+### Store resources for Ansible on jenkins ci master [#871](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/871)
+
+- Rod: What would this be for?
+  - Just things we'd need to set up machines that aren't easy to get from other
+    sites.
+- Rod: I'd like to put my custom-built ARM gcc on there as well.
+- Rod: Could it just be a simple http static file server with NGINX?
+  - Michael: Sure
+- Gibson: Would we want to limit access to just CI machines?
+  - Rod: I'd be fine if people were to start downloading my ARM build.
+- Michael: We'd need an http fallback for machines that have issues with https?
+  - Rod: Seems fine, use https where we can, but fallback to http is fine.
+- Michael: Might it be a security risk?
+  - Rod: I'm much more worried about the security risk that Jenkins poses.
+- Rod: I can set this up today.
+- Gibson: Would that be an infra account?
+  - Rod: Yes, but we can always add an unpriveleged account for test if they
+    need it.
+- Gibson: Might it get overloaded if it's sharing a machine with Jenkins?
+  - Rod: NGINX is really efficient, not worried. If it ends up on StackOverflow
+    we can change it.