Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for removal of pinkywafer/Calendarific #4475

Open
4 tasks done
Menz01 opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Request for removal of pinkywafer/Calendarific #4475

Menz01 opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS

Comments

@Menz01
Copy link

Menz01 commented Mar 3, 2025

Repository

pinkywafer Calendarific

Checklist

  • I understand that this form should only be used for repositories that needs to be removed from HACS
  • I understand that a bug is not reason enough to have a repository removed
  • The repository is currently shipped as a default repository in HACS
  • I have tried to get the authors attention to the reason for removal

Why should this be removed?

the integration does not work as documented. i have opened an issue that has gone unanswered since October of 2024. looking at other issues posted and they have gone unanswered as well.

Link to issue

pinkywafer/Calendarific#47

@Menz01 Menz01 added the flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS label Mar 3, 2025
@hacs-bot
Copy link

hacs-bot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Make sure you have read the issue guidelines and that you filled out the entire template.

If you have an issue identical to this, do not add comments like "same here", "i have this too", instead add a 👍 reaction to the issue description. Thanks! 👍

@ludeeus
Copy link
Member

ludeeus commented Mar 4, 2025

CC @pinkywafer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flag Flagging of repository that should be removed from HACS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants