Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test envelope example for n > 1 (check vs matlab) #24

Closed
chriscoey opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #40
Closed

test envelope example for n > 1 (check vs matlab) #24

chriscoey opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #40

Comments

@chriscoey
Copy link
Collaborator

and timing comparisons into #23

@chriscoey chriscoey added this to the 0.1 milestone Aug 6, 2018
@chriscoey chriscoey changed the title allow n > 1 in envelope example and add as tests test envelope example for n > 1 (check vs matlab) Aug 20, 2018
@chriscoey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chriscoey commented Aug 25, 2018

this was broken by #34 because I incorrectly used the same primitive cone object multiple times in the problem data construction. that's fixed, and I added tests for dense vs sparse A and n > 2.

however, while the tests run fine for n <= 2, at n = 3 I am consistently getting the problem coming back nearly infeasible.

this suggests that there may be a problem with the clenshaw-curtis weights calculations for approximate fekete points. these values not used in the namedpoly tests so they aren't tested there. debugging is WIP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant