Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: inline preview #80

Closed
4 of 8 tasks
jeanm opened this issue Dec 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed
4 of 8 tasks

Feature request: inline preview #80

jeanm opened this issue Dec 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Feature requests and code enhancements

Comments

@jeanm
Copy link

jeanm commented Dec 7, 2017

Operating system

  • Windows
  • macOS
  • Linux
  • Android
  • iOS

Application

  • Desktop
  • Mobile
  • Terminal

An inline preview would be a really neat addition to Joplin, and would make the separate preview pane redundant. Here is a great example of how to implement this: https://github.com/brrd/Abricotine

@laurent22 laurent22 added the enhancement Feature requests and code enhancements label Dec 7, 2017
@infinity85
Copy link

Wow, this Abricotine is an awesome editor!

I really love joplin as an Evernote alternative, though I miss features like

  • html export
  • interpretation of html code (to write e.g. coloured text).
  • Also the renderer doesn't show grey background for quotations and especially code paragraphs

So a hybrid of joplin with this Abricotine would fulfil kind of all wishes :D

These features are kind of part of every markdown editor out there. But I understand that joplin is very young and I really enjoy that it exists :-)

Please keep up this awesome work!!!

@laurent22
Copy link
Owner

Duplicate of #176

@laurent22 laurent22 marked this as a duplicate of #176 Feb 16, 2018
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Feature requests and code enhancements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants