You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are currently using github.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4 for our secp256k1 cryptography. It seems Lotus folks have recently switched to gitlab.com/yawning/secp256k1-voi for their secp256k1 crypto for reasons I don't yet understand. Some Lotus folks have asked if we should move to that library as well.
I'm opening this issue to try to understand and document if there's any benefit to moving to the yawning crypto, or some other crypto library (https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto was also brought up).
Note: I don't think there is a compatibility/interoperability issue here, as any correct library should work interoperate.
Could folks with more context please chime in on one would prefer gitlab.com/yawning/secp256k1-voi or fiat-crypto or specifically not our current decred/dcrd library. And, relatedly, why go-libp2p in particular would benefit?
We are currently using
github.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4
for our secp256k1 cryptography. It seems Lotus folks have recently switched togitlab.com/yawning/secp256k1-voi
for their secp256k1 crypto for reasons I don't yet understand. Some Lotus folks have asked if we should move to that library as well.I'm opening this issue to try to understand and document if there's any benefit to moving to the yawning crypto, or some other crypto library (https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto was also brought up).
Note: I don't think there is a compatibility/interoperability issue here, as any correct library should work interoperate.
Could folks with more context please chime in on one would prefer
gitlab.com/yawning/secp256k1-voi
orfiat-crypto
or specifically not our currentdecred/dcrd
library. And, relatedly, why go-libp2p in particular would benefit?cc
@AnomalRoil – Expressed preference for the yawning library
@Stebalien – Involved in the change for Lotus
@ribasushi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: