-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Filter/Search Page #3848
Comments
Regarding LAPIS/SILO:
At the moment, one would have to send a query that filters for all other available values. We have, however, just started working on implementing advanced searches, which would directly allow this.
I'm not sure but I'll discuss this at the latest next Wednesday with the others. |
I think this is already supported in LAPIS, e.g. so this is just a matter of website code |
For some types it works but it seems that it is not supporting dates: example. I'm not entirely certain at the moment whether it is a bug or a not-implemented feature (but I think it's the latter). (@Taepper and @fengelniederhammer probably know more?) |
Hmm, SILO supports filtering for Negations, And, Or, NOf, etc. and therefore can cover all of the above, so this is possible (also for dates, albeit with a different query than is necessary for Strings). So LAPIS should be able to map this correctly |
Looks quite useful to me! I think for the UI the excel-way of doing things also looks good, making it possible to select multiple values in the drop down. |
This is a mega-issue designed to help us consider how we'd like to improve filtering/searching. This should help us tackle some of the below, which include previous issues (marked where appropriate), including:
The recent PR which adds the currently applied searches to the top of the page will make these easier to support as it'll be much clearer to see what's currently applied (and clear individually), but we should still think about implementation.
One idea is to implement something like Excel, where tick marks show what's applied (and multiple items can be ticked) - 'blank' included. (Also important is a way to select all and deselect all)
I believe all of this should be supported on the LAPIS/SILO side, but am less clear on 'everything except blanks' and 'inverse searching'. I guess with the 'Excel-style' execution it may not matter as Maybe @chaoran-chen or @Taepper could comment there?
Sub issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: