Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why we need minus w_y_i in the end? #14

Open
abeardear opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

why we need minus w_y_i in the end? #14

abeardear opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@abeardear
Copy link

i don't understand why we need minus w_y_i (or x_i) in the end of the formula. silly question------

@luoyetx
Copy link
Owner

luoyetx commented Sep 27, 2017

take a look at the derivatives. here is the latex version

@abeardear
Copy link
Author

you remove y_i != j, so we should do it. Am I right?

@luoyetx
Copy link
Owner

luoyetx commented Sep 27, 2017

Yes. The first item is the original fc derivatives.

@abeardear
Copy link
Author

I understand it. Thank you for your patience.

@auroua
Copy link

auroua commented Nov 19, 2017

Does the definition of J equals the equation (4) in original paper?
I can't understand the derivation from 1 to 2 in your latex version.
I have wrote some definition of the relations about different variables.
_2017-11-19_12-54-09
Can you help me to point out what I have wrong. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants