-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error: Missing lock for job X failed #13702
Comments
Hey @Fank, We have created an internal ticket to look into this which we will be tracking as "GHC-1061" |
Hey @Fank, What do you mean by "task seperated by main and an execution"? |
Dedicated worker, which runs the executions and the main is only the one who queues the executions. |
Hey @Fank, I am not able to reproduce this in my environment, What is the error in the UI that you are seeing? Looking at the |
Hey @Fank, Looking at the resource usage there this isn't feeling like a bug and more of a deployment issue. The browser hitting out of memory can occur without the worker hitting the same limit due to the extra data the front end works with, The 100% CPU is likely going to cause issues though so you may need to tweak your workflows or increase the available resources. |
Thanks for the tip I think the kapa.ai in discord gave me a good idea of parsing the csv in steps instead of all at once. |
Hey @Fank, If the worker can't connect to Redis or the database I would expect there to be some issues, It will eventually reconnect and I suspect the job has been cleaned up when it comes back which shows the error, The good news is this message shouldn't impact anything but it will be interesting to see how things start running for you once you have everything sorted. We are always working on improving our scaling process as well so I suspect this will only get better as we start to spend more time on it. |
Bug Description
When using worker to run task seperated by main and an execution fails it shows always looks like this:
docker-compose.yml
of the worker:Debug info
core
storage
pruning
client
Generated at: 2025-03-05T11:49:03.933Z
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
I think this error should not be shown, also
Queue errored
should be shown once I think.Operating System
docker (self-hosted)
n8n Version
1.81.4
Node.js Version
20.18.3
Database
PostgreSQL
Execution mode
queue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: