You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes definitions might origin from several sources (maybe two or three).
How should these multiple sources be entered in the "Source Vocab URI" of the Concepts tab ?
Is it possible to enter multiple URIs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree, @dalito ,
improving provenance information would make the vocabulary assembly more transparent, but it might requires quite some development time.
How much effort would it be to just allow a whitespace separated list of URIs in the "Source Vocab" column ? (as a quick fix)
How much effort would it be to just allow a whitespace separated list of URIs in the "Source Vocab" column ? (as a quick fix)
This would be technically easy since the same is done already for childrenIRIs. However, "Source Vocab" is converted to RDFS:isDefinedBy. Therefore, it should be a single value (or no value). "Source Vocab" should be used if term & definition are verbatim copies. What is missing is a multivalue field for referring loosely to multiple sources that are expressed in RDF as prov:wasInfluencedBy. This will be addressed as part of #124.
Sometimes definitions might origin from several sources (maybe two or three).
How should these multiple sources be entered in the "Source Vocab URI" of the Concepts tab ?
Is it possible to enter multiple URIs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: