You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently have a digest grammar with no defined grammar syntax. I had previously floated transitioning that grammar to the well-defined ABNF, but #655 was rejected. There has recently been a lot of discussion about various grammar syntax in #671, but no consensus around picking an externally-defined grammar or adding local definition for the grammar. Many of the external grammars are very similar to the current digest grammar:
We currently have a digest grammar with no defined grammar syntax. I had previously floated transitioning that grammar to the well-defined ABNF, but #655 was rejected. There has recently been a lot of discussion about various grammar syntax in #671, but no consensus around picking an externally-defined grammar or adding local definition for the grammar. Many of the external grammars are very similar to the current digest grammar:
being very similar to XML 1.0 EBNF:
After extensive discussion on IRC today (starting here), @stevvooe offered to define the grammar if I filed an issue, so here it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: