Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the phase tap changer FIXED_TAP regulation mode #3344

Open
alicecaron opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Remove the phase tap changer FIXED_TAP regulation mode #3344

alicecaron opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@alicecaron
Copy link
Contributor

alicecaron commented Mar 4, 2025

Describe the current behavior

A PhaseTapChanger regulation mode can be set among the three following ones: FIXED_TAP, CURRENT_LIMITER, ACTIVE_POWER_CONTROL.

Describe the expected behavior

A PhaseTapChanger regulation mode can be set among the two following ones: CURRENT_LIMITER, ACTIVE_POWER_CONTROL, if not the validation level should remain EQUIPEMENT, an error message is logged and an exception is thrown if the boolean throwException is true.

To assure the retro compatibility on previous IIDM versions, when a phase tap changer is imported with a FIXED_TAP regulation mode, a warning message is logged and a teh regulation mode by default is be set (and should be CURRENT_LIMITER).

Describe the motivation

A regulation mode in FIXED_TAP usages are similar to the a non regulating PhaseTapChanger. This information is already represented with the regulating boolean. This mode induces confusion in the possible combinations of the (regulationMode, regulating) attributes couples.

Extra Information

PhaseShifterSetAsFixedTap and PhaseShifterShiftTap modifications will only set the PhaseTapChanger regulating value to false and set the tap position as given.

Impacts open load flow which needs to remove also the usages of FIXED_TAP regulation mode for a phase tap changer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant