Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Some minor typo fixes in the StackingCVRegressor docs #295

Closed
rasbt opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Some minor typo fixes in the StackingCVRegressor docs #295

rasbt opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
Documentation easy

Comments

@rasbt
Copy link
Owner

rasbt commented Nov 30, 2017

There are a few typos/inconsistencies in the StackingCVRegressor code. These should be addressed after #294 has been merged, to avoid unnecessary merge-conflict pain

  • predict, get_params etc. don't have docstrings
  • the meta_regressor description mentions a StackingCVClassifier
@rasbt
Copy link
Owner Author

rasbt commented Dec 4, 2017

This was fixed in #297

@rasbt rasbt closed this as completed Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Documentation easy
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rasbt