You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My 4 servers are running scheduler, but 5th started crashing with "There's already an active RQ scheduler" message. But there is no active RQ scheduler on this particular machine. There is active scheduler on other machine.
I've inspected the code and I do not understand what for are registering birhts and deaths. There is lock already implemented. The scheduler_key is shared between all instances. There is no real difference between "local" and "remote" instances.
I think that briths and deaths can be removed. Any thoughts?
Edit: sometimes rqscheduler runs on two or more machines, sometimes just one can work at once. This is bad, because there is no redundancy (failover)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi.
My 4 servers are running scheduler, but 5th started crashing with "There's already an active RQ scheduler" message. But there is no active RQ scheduler on this particular machine. There is active scheduler on other machine.
I've inspected the code and I do not understand what for are registering birhts and deaths. There is lock already implemented. The scheduler_key is shared between all instances. There is no real difference between "local" and "remote" instances.
I think that briths and deaths can be removed. Any thoughts?
Edit: sometimes rqscheduler runs on two or more machines, sometimes just one can work at once. This is bad, because there is no redundancy (failover)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: