Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate different Natural Language Dates strings for Review #26

Open
ryanjamurphy opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Generate different Natural Language Dates strings for Review #26

ryanjamurphy opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@ryanjamurphy
Copy link
Owner

Would it be possible to modify the input coming from natural language dates for review? The situation for me is this:

  • I keep all my timestamped files in a separate folder. This includes daily and weekly notes, meeting notes etc.
  • To distinguish the daily notes (I call them plans as I used them mostly for planning) from other files with the same date, I use the format 'YYYY.MM.DD dddd plan'
  • In order to use review, however, this means that I need to include the 'plan' as part of the date format for natural language dates. So if I want to use that plugin in another context (to insert a date directly into a file, for eg) I have to insert it and go back and delete the 'plan'
  • It would be super neat if I could have the date format for natural language dates as YYYY.MM.DD dddd and then have the review plugin know to add the 'plan' part to look for the right daily note.

But maybe too tricky to do? Please let me know if you would prefer me to open another thread for this.

Originally posted by @pwal2425 in #25 (comment)

@ryanjamurphy
Copy link
Owner Author

I'll look into this. It should be possible—in fact it was an option in previous versions but I removed custom filename strings to reduce confusion.

@patrickcjwall
Copy link

Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants