-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
sbt is not signed, so it's not installed on Fedora 16 with default command #17
Comments
Huh, the packages should be signed. Perhaps you don't trust the key yet? id: e29df322 |
It's the same on Fedora 17. sbt is not installed with the given command. |
Same issue here on CentOS 6.2. The RPM package is not signed.
|
I can confirm for Fedora 17 with @claussni |
I confirm that too. :( |
This is still not working. What can we do to fix this? The typesafe-stack is not installable on Fedora because of this... |
I can confirm this on Fedora 17. |
I can confirm this on CentOs |
use --nogpgcheck |
@ninjakeyboard : Yes, disabling the GPG check is a known workaround -- @rssh already mentioned this in the very first message in this ticket. However, the use of digital signatures when installing software is there for a reason. The purpose of this ticket is to enable the installation of sbt /with/ proper GPG checks on Fedora and CentOS. |
ah sorry - missed that :P I just went through this so thought I'd post what I did to get the server together. |
Ok, added a feature request to sbt-native-packager for this. WIth the migration to bintray, there may be an alternative solution. |
I am closing this due to inactivity, but if this is still relevant let us know with more details (reproduction steps etc). |
yum install sbt
.....
Package sbt-0.11.3-1.noarch.rpm is not signed
[root@aa22 fixture-state-management]#
Workaround is disable gnupg check by using
or alter /etc/yum.repos.d/typesafe.repo by adding line 'gnupgcheck=0' at the end on file, but better sign package ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: