-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would be possible to provide an xdg module as well? #1
Comments
Can you elaborate? The XDG directories are determined just by checking an environment variable and thats about it - I guess I can make that its own module, but it also doesn't seem that would be compatible with the behavior of |
I noticed now, yes it wouldn't be much useful until the xdg defaults are provided |
I am interested in this though, if you have any ideas on how an ideal implementation of a migration would look. |
It would imply to add the usual known xdg defaults I guess. |
But if you are a tool looking to move over, what would that look like ideally vs now? What is the solution trying to do? If this repository provided an identical interface to the old dirs, it a) then has the same issue and b) how would having access to that make migration easier? |
I'd have separate modules for the strategies:
|
So people that want to migrate from
directories
can pave a no-friction upgrade path for their users.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: