You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
The current definition of blockchain on the Wiki would define a blockchain as merely a message passing system, with no distinction from legacy distributed ledgers such as ACH and SWIFT.
Wasn't the innovation of a blockchain that of a 'permissionless' system, secured by Proof of Work? Or have we been using blockchains since the 80's? (And if so - why is this project relevant or interesting?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The feature that makes the Blockchain interesting is its decentralized platform where every node is complete within itself. However, the blockchain provides the private key to the user which makes the user an authorized person to work on the platform.
As far as the innovation of a blockchain that of a 'permissionless' system, secured by Proof of Work is concerned, I don't think that this would happen. Every technology is supported with the "Proof of Work" to ensure the committed volume of work with superior quality.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The current definition of blockchain on the Wiki would define a blockchain as merely a message passing system, with no distinction from legacy distributed ledgers such as ACH and SWIFT.
Wasn't the innovation of a blockchain that of a 'permissionless' system, secured by Proof of Work? Or have we been using blockchains since the 80's? (And if so - why is this project relevant or interesting?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: