You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There might be fundamental differences between notty's approach and iTerm2's image handling, but either way, given there are at least two terminals with image support, there may be a chance for collaboration?
I do a lot of command-line image work, and it would be cool if I could support notty and iTerm both with the same protocol, although this is not a strong need.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The protocol is different but the fundamental approach is basically the same (unlike, for example, Terminology, which uses a file/URL based approach). I'll consider adding special support for iTerm2's image command.
There might be fundamental differences between notty's approach and iTerm2's image handling, but either way, given there are at least two terminals with image support, there may be a chance for collaboration?
I do a lot of command-line image work, and it would be cool if I could support notty and iTerm both with the same protocol, although this is not a strong need.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: