-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
delete the inverted key in connection_states eBPF map on tcp termination #34586
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 58481128 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: a1a9a43 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.08 | [+0.00, +0.16] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.73, +0.83] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.83, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.28, +0.31] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.02, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.67, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.83, +0.82] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.90, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.65, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.08 | [-0.86, +0.69] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.57, +0.35] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.56 | [-0.64, -0.49] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.85 | [-0.92, -0.78] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.46 | [-2.31, -0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -2.12 | [-2.29, -1.96] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -3.26 | [-5.92, -0.60] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
eBPF complexity changesSummary result: ✅ - stable
usm detailsusm [programs with changes]
usm [programs without changes]
This report was generated based on the complexity data for the current branch yuri.l/USMON-1413_conn_states (pipeline 57362855, commit 9c3ceae) and the base branch main (commit 1c10512). Objects without changes are not reported. Contact #ebpf-platform if you have any questions/feedback. Table complexity legend: 🔵 - new; ⚪ - unchanged; 🟢 - reduced; 🔴 - increased |
Static quality checks ❌Please find below the results from static quality gates Error
Gate failure full details
Successful checksInfo
|
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=58481128 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 1409a78 |
Static quality checks ✅Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Each dispatcher_entrypoint inserts an entry into connections_states
for only one sides of the connection
why do we delete both sides?
Each side of the connection creates two entries in the table, one for the incoming packet and one for the acknowledgment packet. If the peer issues a RST segment, the connection is immediately terminated and there is no acknowledgment, leaving a stale entry in the map. Also, a FIN segment from the peer may not result with a FIN-ACK and leaves a stale entry in the map. |
What does this PR do?
Changes eBPF program
protocol_dispatcher_entrypoint
to delete both keys - connection tuple and inverted tuple, in the mapconnection_states
on TCP termination.Motivation
It was found that connection_states map gets full on staging clusters, example here.

Describe how you validated your changes
Passed CI Us.

This code fix was deployed on staging cluster parent12, the metrics show full maps before fix deployment and fill level drop after the fix. Metrics.
HTTP load tests dashboard show no impact on
system-probe cpu

system-probe memory

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes