This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
add payer support for kv table #942
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Comment on lines
891
to
892
| void put(const T& value) { | ||
| put(value, kv_table_base::contract_name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My preference would be to have KV mirror multi-index and not provide a default like this and instead always require the payer to be specified. The contract can use get_self() to pay for the resources if they choose.
jeffreyssmith2nd
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2020
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Description
Allow application developers flexibility to choose who pays for resources.
API Changes
kv_table::put()has an additional optional parameterpayerDocumentation Additions