You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2022. It is now read-only.
Admins (Talent Cloud Concierge) should have the ability to flag an applicant (Identifiable by name and/or email) as a Priority. Priorities are treated differently in the application process, so they need to be made visible to managers. The intent is to have them displayed separately on the Review Applicants page #687.
Down the road we will try and build something that allows priorities to self-identify, but for now, they have to contact Talent Cloud and our concierge service will upgrade their user profile through the admin portal.
For now users are either priorities or they are not, but in the future we might want to allow for various types (levels) of priorities. It's not of interest right now, but we might put a time limit on how long a person is a priority for (since priority status normally expires at some point).
@tristan-orourke I pushed up what I have working so far on feature/add-priority-to-applicants. I've hit a bit of a wall around assigning the checkbox value to the applicant priority field, as it doesn't seem to work the way I thought it could.
Description
Admins (Talent Cloud Concierge) should have the ability to flag an applicant (Identifiable by name and/or email) as a Priority. Priorities are treated differently in the application process, so they need to be made visible to managers. The intent is to have them displayed separately on the Review Applicants page #687.
Down the road we will try and build something that allows priorities to self-identify, but for now, they have to contact Talent Cloud and our concierge service will upgrade their user profile through the admin portal.
For now users are either priorities or they are not, but in the future we might want to allow for various types (levels) of priorities. It's not of interest right now, but we might put a time limit on how long a person is a priority for (since priority status normally expires at some point).
This issue is a dependency of #690.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: