Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python 3.13 #1517

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

Python 3.13 #1517

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 4, 2024

Conversation

pbiering
Copy link
Collaborator

@pbiering pbiering commented Jun 9, 2024

No description provided.

@pbiering pbiering self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@pbiering pbiering added the prio:low low priority label Jun 10, 2024
@pbiering
Copy link
Collaborator Author

"ubuntu-latest" has still no Python 3.13 preview on board...will be postponed...

@deronnax
Copy link
Contributor

I think the correct naming would be '3.13.0-beta.4'.
Source: https://github.com/actions/setup-python/blob/main/docs/advanced-usage.md#python, especially the 2nd bullet point: Downloadable Python versions from GitHub Release , which led me to https://github.com/actions/python-versions/releases, which led me to https://github.com/actions/python-versions/releases/tag/3.13.0-beta.4-9993951762.

@pbiering pbiering added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Jul 25, 2024
@pbiering
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@deronnax: thank you for the hint...so far the test runs failing :-(

@deronnax
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, still the same python 3.12.4+ error: TypeError: ForwardRef._evaluate() missing 1 required keyword-only argument: 'recursive_guard'. We need to move to a more recent version of typeguard because it's fixed in 4.3.0 (in agronholm/typeguard#460).

Btw, is typeguard really used? I saw almost no occurrences in the code.

@pbiering
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pbiering commented Jul 25, 2024

Yep, still the same python 3.12.4+ error: TypeError: ForwardRef._evaluate() missing 1 required keyword-only argument: 'recursive_guard'. We need to move to a more recent version of typeguard because it's fixed in 4.3.0 (in agronholm/typeguard#460).

Btw, is typeguard really used?

I don't know, haven't investigated so far. But I had to pin to < 4.3 as 4.3.0 throwed other errors afair.

I saw almost no occurrences in the code.

One need to check, potentially historic purposes?!

@pbiering pbiering modified the milestones: 3.3.0, 3.2.3 Aug 4, 2024
@pbiering pbiering merged commit 45f0b88 into Kozea:master Aug 4, 2024
24 checks passed
@pbiering pbiering deleted the python-3.13 branch January 27, 2025 04:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants