Skip to content

Make reordering function transparent so it can compute in Coq #2690

Make reordering function transparent so it can compute in Coq

Make reordering function transparent so it can compute in Coq #2690

Triggered via push February 21, 2024 16:58
Status Success
Total duration 36m 59s
Artifacts

build.yml

on: push
checktodos
3s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

40 warnings
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
There is no flag or option with this name:
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
There is no flag or option with this name:
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.