This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add pop-out explanation for Python layers #651
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| <h1>Using Python layers</h1> | ||
|
|
||
| <p> | ||
| Caffe lets you can define custom layers with Python. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Haha whoops - right at the beginning! Thanks.
|
This is working for me (I tried both the "blank square" and "accuracy" layers examples on MNIST+LeNet). |
lukeyeager
force-pushed
the
python-layer-explanation
branch
from
41e2e34 to
a687ed6
Compare
|
Thanks for the review, Greg. Here's a screenshot of the feature for those who are interested:
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Close #636
Cleanup Python layer upload UI and add some pop-out text similar to #628 (comment).
Also add network outputs with names containing "accuracy" to the accuracy axis in graphs. It's a little hacky, but I don't think we need to find a general purpose solution to that problem just yet.