can_read method for NWBHDF5IO respects NWB version

[bendichter]

Motivation

See hdmf-dev/hdmf#875

How to test the behavior?

from pynwb import NWBHDF5IO

NWBHDF5IO.can_read("my_nwb_file.nwb")

Checklist

• Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
• Have you checked our Contributing document?
• Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
• Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running flake8 from the source directory.
• Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

[CodyCBakerPhD]

I think this PR just needs tests?

[oruebel]

I think this PR just needs tests?

Yes, I think fixing of errors and adding tests seems to be what's needed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1703 (b1b956f) into dev (734a6c4) will increase coverage by 8.08%.
The diff coverage is 65.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1703      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.66%   91.75%   +8.08%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        2608     2619      +11     
  Branches      681      684       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2182     2403     +221     
+ Misses        339      141     -198     
+ Partials       87       75      -12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	71.09% <65.00%> (?)
unit	83.46% <45.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/pynwb/__init__.py	75.73% <65.00%> (+2.95%)	⬆️

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more