-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AVM: Add support for Boxes #4149
Conversation
Co-authored-by: algochoi <[email protected]>
…and into readme-examples-for-goal
…llation and goal's executable path
…and into readme-examples-for-goal
At least three four left to consider, as well as extensive testing. Catchpoints, LRU cache, new hash costs
* README.md as committed to in the last retro * See https://gist.github.com/tzaffi/d57018cb826f4766f8f4ce2ba4dbaec8 for the Justfile that was originally in the PR.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4149 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 54.49% 54.18% -0.32%
==========================================
Files 407 413 +6
Lines 52425 53408 +983
==========================================
+ Hits 28569 28939 +370
- Misses 21472 22060 +588
- Partials 2384 2409 +25
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Feature/avm box
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although I disagree with not storing any bits of boxes in ApplyData, everything else looks good for me.
PR looks ready to merge. Since I opened it, I can't approve. Note - Calling it out so it's not forgotten: #4704 is also needed for the release. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the whole looks good. I left some nits but I don't view them as blockers
@@ -28,9 +28,8 @@ import ( | |||
"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/protocol" | |||
) | |||
|
|||
type logicLedger struct { | |||
cow cowForLogicLedger |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just noticed, the cowForLogicLedger interface is now no longer used as a type anywhere in the code — I guess the interface listing below mostly exists as documentation (??) but could be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing. I thought I had - maybe it came back in a merge.
code review
Provides an integration branch PR to simplify tracking changes to
feature/avm-box
in support of #3890.