fix(components): remove unused userkey #1093
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe recent changes streamline the codebase by eliminating unnecessary dependencies on user keys and enhancing type consistency, particularly for Flexbox properties. This refactor simplifies component logic and improves overall performance. By ensuring Flex properties are numeric, the code aligns with best practices in React, promoting better layout management and maintainability across various components and hooks. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Component
participant Store
User->>App: Interacts with UI
App->>Component: Renders without user key logic
Component->>Store: Fetches data without user key
Store-->>Component: Returns data
Component-->>App: Updates UI
App->>User: Displays results
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/components/modal/list/RemoveList.tsx (1)
23-23: Verify the Impact of RemovinguserKeyon User-Specific Data HandlingThe
removeListfunction insrc/lib/stores/contract.tsutilizesuserKeyto manage user-specific contract information. RemovinguserKeyfrom its invocation may disrupt this functionality, potentially affecting authorization or identification logic related to user-specific data. Please review this change to ensure it does not introduce any unintended side effects.
- Location of Concern:
src/lib/stores/contract.ts:removeListfunction usesthis.userKeyfor accessing contract information.Analysis chain
Removal of
userKeyis appropriate but verify its impact.The removal of
userKeysimplifies theremoveListfunction call. Ensure that this change does not affect authorization or identification logic elsewhere in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the removal of `userKey` affects other parts of the codebase. # Test: Search for `userKey` usage in the repository. Expect: No critical dependencies on `userKey` for list removal. rg --type js --type ts 'userKey'Length of output: 5966
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of the `removeList` function to understand its logic. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function removeList($_) { $$$ }' rg 'removeList' -A 5Length of output: 1359
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (30)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/ListSelection.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/PublicDescription.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/StickySidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/TagSelection.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/list/CreateNewList.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/list/EditListName.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/lib/components/modal/list/RemoveList.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/select-contract/ContractListCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/table/codes/CodesTableMobileCard.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/table/proposals/ProposalsTableMobileCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/hooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/lib/hooks/useHandleSave.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/model/code.ts (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/account-details/components/PublicAccountDesc.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/account-details/components/UserAccountDesc.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/block-details/components/BlockInfo.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/InstantiateInfo.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/contract-description/UserContractDesc.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/tables/migration/MigrationMobileCard.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/instantiate/component/InstantiateOffchainForm.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/module-details/components/tables/history/PublishedEventsTableMobileCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/proposal/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/public-project/components/tables/codes/PublicProjectCodeMobileCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/public-project/components/tables/contracts/PublicProjectContractMobileCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/tx-details/components/TxInfoMobile.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/lib/pages/validators/components/validators-table/ValidatorsTableMobileCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/stores/code.test.ts (5 hunks)
- src/lib/stores/code.ts (1 hunks)
- src/lib/stores/contract.ts (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (13)
- CHANGELOG.md
- src/lib/components/table/codes/CodesTableMobileCard.tsx
- src/lib/components/table/proposals/ProposalsTableMobileCard.tsx
- src/lib/hooks/index.ts
- src/lib/hooks/useHandleSave.tsx
- src/lib/pages/block-details/components/BlockInfo.tsx
- src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/InstantiateInfo.tsx
- src/lib/pages/instantiate/component/InstantiateOffchainForm.tsx
- src/lib/pages/proposal/components/Footer.tsx
- src/lib/pages/public-project/components/tables/codes/PublicProjectCodeMobileCard.tsx
- src/lib/pages/public-project/components/tables/contracts/PublicProjectContractMobileCard.tsx
- src/lib/pages/tx-details/components/TxInfoMobile.tsx
- src/lib/pages/validators/components/validators-table/ValidatorsTableMobileCard.tsx
Additional comments not posted (27)
src/lib/pages/account-details/components/PublicAccountDesc.tsx (1)
13-13: Change to numericflexvalue is appropriate.Changing
flexfrom a string to a numeric value improves type consistency and aligns with best practices in React and CSS-in-JS libraries.src/lib/components/PublicDescription.tsx (1)
37-37: Change to numericflexvalue is appropriate.Changing
flexfrom a string to a numeric value improves type consistency and aligns with best practices in React and CSS-in-JS libraries.src/lib/pages/module-details/components/tables/history/PublishedEventsTableMobileCard.tsx (1)
36-36: Change to numericflexvalue is appropriate.Changing
flexfrom a string to a numeric value improves type consistency and aligns with best practices in React and CSS-in-JS libraries.src/lib/stores/code.ts (1)
52-53: Simplification of method signatures is appropriate.Removing the
userKeyparameter fromlastSavedCodeIdsandlastSavedCodessimplifies the method signatures and reinforces the use of instance properties, enhancing clarity and consistency.Also applies to: 56-67
src/lib/pages/account-details/components/UserAccountDesc.tsx (1)
60-60: Correct use of numeric flex value.Changing the
flexproperty from a string"1"to a numeric{1}is a best practice for flexbox properties, ensuring proper layout calculations.src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/contract-description/UserContractDesc.tsx (1)
47-47: Correct use of numeric flex value.Changing the
flexproperty from a string"1"to a numeric{1}is a best practice for flexbox properties, ensuring proper layout calculations.src/lib/components/select-contract/ContractListCard.tsx (1)
90-90: Appropriate use of zIndex for stacking context.Adding
zIndex={10}to theMenuListensures it appears above other overlapping elements, enhancing the user interface.src/lib/model/code.ts (1)
34-37: Verify the impact of removing userKey.The removal of
userKeyfromuseSavedCodesbroadens the scope of saved codes accessed. Ensure this change aligns with user data management and access control requirements.src/lib/components/modal/list/EditListName.tsx (1)
47-47: Simplification by removing userKey dependency.The removal of
userKeysimplifies state management and enhances maintainability without affecting core functionality.Also applies to: 62-62
src/lib/components/modal/list/CreateNewList.tsx (2)
54-54: LGTM! But verifyisContractListExistusage.The removal of
userKeysimplifies the logic. Ensure thatisContractListExistfunctions correctly withoutuserKey.Verification successful
isContractListExistFunction Correctly Implemented WithoutuserKeyThe
isContractListExistfunction does not useuserKey, aligning with the changes inCreateNewListModal. However,userKeyis still used in other parts of thecontract.tsfile, indicating its relevance in the broader context of contract management.
- Location:
src/lib/stores/contract.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `isContractListExist` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling without `userKey`. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'isContractListExist'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `isContractListExist` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling without `userKey`. rg --glob '*.js' --glob '*.ts' -A 5 $'isContractListExist'Length of output: 1110
Line range hint
67-82: LGTM! But verifycreateNewListusage.The
createNewListfunction no longer requiresuserKey. Ensure that this change does not affect its behavior elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Verify
createNewListUsage: Contextual Dependency onuserKeyThe
createNewListfunction insrc/lib/stores/contract.tsrelies onthis.userKey, indicating it uses internal state or context rather than requiringuserKeyas a parameter. This aligns with its usage inCreateNewList.tsx, whereuserKeyis not passed explicitly. Ensure that this reliance on internal state is intentional and does not affect other parts of the codebase.
File:
src/lib/stores/contract.ts
- Ensure
this.userKeyis correctly set in the context wherecreateNewListis used.File:
src/lib/components/modal/list/CreateNewList.tsx
- Verify that no explicit
userKeyis needed when callingcreateNewList.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `createNewList` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling without `userKey`. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'createNewList'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `createNewList` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling without `userKey`. rg --type js --type ts -A 5 $'createNewList'Length of output: 1806
src/lib/stores/code.test.ts (2)
55-65: LGTM! But verify test coverage forCodeStore.The removal of
TEST_USER_KEYsimplifies the tests. Ensure that the tests still cover all necessary scenarios.Verification successful
Test Coverage for
CodeStoreis ComprehensiveThe
CodeStoreis well-covered by tests insrc/lib/stores/code.test.ts, and the removal ofTEST_USER_KEYdoes not seem to impact the test coverage adversely. The existing tests continue to validate the necessary functionality ofCodeStore.
- File:
src/lib/stores/code.test.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `CodeStore`. # Test: Check for test cases related to `CodeStore`. Expect: Comprehensive coverage without `TEST_USER_KEY`. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'CodeStore'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for `CodeStore`. # Test: Check for test cases related to `CodeStore`. Expect: Comprehensive coverage without `TEST_USER_KEY`. rg -A 5 'CodeStore'Length of output: 18651
Line range hint
74-94: Ensure test isolation.The removal of user-specific contexts may affect test isolation. Verify that tests do not share state unintentionally.
src/lib/components/StickySidebar.tsx (1)
72-72: LGTM! But verify layout behavior.Changing the
flexproperty to a numeric value aligns with best practices. Ensure that the layout behaves as expected.Verification successful
Layout behavior verified for
StickySidebar.The change of the
flexproperty to a numeric value in theBoxcomponent aligns with best practices and should not disrupt the layout. TheStickySidebarcomponent is used within aGridlayout, which is compatible with numericflexvalues. No issues were found regarding layout behavior.
- Instances of
StickySidebarusage show consistent styling.- Numeric
flexvalues are standard and should not affect layout adversely.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify layout behavior in `StickySidebar`. # Test: Check for potential layout issues. Expect: Consistent layout with numeric `flex` values. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'StickySidebar'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all TypeScript files and search for the usage of `StickySidebar` to verify layout impacts. fd --extension ts --extension tsx --exec rg 'StickySidebar' {}Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances of `StickySidebar` with additional context to understand its layout and styling. rg 'StickySidebar' -A 10 --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all TypeScript and TSX files and search for the usage of `StickySidebar` with context. fd --extension ts --extension tsx --exec rg 'StickySidebar' -A 10 {}Length of output: 2789
src/lib/pages/contract-details/components/tables/migration/MigrationMobileCard.tsx (3)
118-118: LGTM! But verify layout behavior.Ensure that the numeric
flexvalues do not affect the layout unexpectedly.
51-51: LGTM! But verify layout behavior.The change to numeric
flexvalues improves consistency. Ensure that the layout behaves as expected.
104-104: LGTM! But verify layout behavior.Ensure that the numeric
flexvalues do not affect the layout unexpectedly.Verification successful
Layout Behavior Verified: Numeric
flexValues inMigrationMobileCardThe use of
flex={1}in theMigrationMobileCardcomponent is standard and should not cause unexpected layout behavior. The layout should be consistent unless there are external constraints or styles not visible in the current context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify layout behavior in `MigrationMobileCard`. # Test: Check for potential layout issues. Expect: Consistent layout with numeric `flex` values. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 5 $'MigrationMobileCard'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify layout behavior in `MigrationMobileCard`. # Test: Check for potential layout issues. Expect: Consistent layout with numeric `flex` values. rg --type ts -A 5 'MigrationMobileCard'Length of output: 4351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the `MigrationMobileCard` component to verify layout behavior. # Use ast-grep to find the full component implementation in the TypeScript file. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const MigrationMobileCard = ($$$) => { $$$ }'Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for the full implementation of the `MigrationMobileCard` component to verify layout behavior. # Search for the component definition and capture surrounding lines for context. rg --type ts -A 20 'export const MigrationMobileCard'Length of output: 2467
src/lib/components/ListSelection.tsx (1)
114-114: LGTM! But verifyListSelectionfunctionality.The removal of
userKeysimplifies the logic. Ensure that theListSelectioncomponent functions as expected.src/lib/components/TagSelection.tsx (1)
64-64: Simplification of tag retrieval.The removal of the
userKeyparameter in thegetAllTagsmethod simplifies theTagSelectioncomponent. Ensure that this change does not affect the specificity of the tags retrieved if user-specific tags were previously intended.Verification successful
Removal of
userKeyparameter does not affect functionality.The
getAllTagsmethod still usesthis.userKeyinternally to retrieve user-specific tags. The removal of theuserKeyparameter from its call in theTagSelectioncomponent does not impact the specificity of tag retrieval.
src/lib/stores/contract.ts:getAllTagsusesthis.userKeyinternally.src/lib/components/TagSelection.tsx: CallsgetAllTags()without parameters, maintaining functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `userKey` parameter on tag retrieval. # Test: Search for the `getAllTags` method usage. Expect: No userKey parameter. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'getAllTags'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `userKey` parameter on tag retrieval. # Test: Search for the `getAllTags` method usage. Expect: No userKey parameter. rg --type ts -A 5 $'getAllTags'Length of output: 1010
src/lib/stores/contract.ts (8)
117-121: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyingetContractList.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callinggetContractList, as it now relies on this property for retrieving contract lists.
149-152: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyinisContractListExist.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callingisContractListExist, as it now relies on this property for checking contract list existence.
159-163: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyincreateNewList.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callingcreateNewList, as it now relies on this property for creating new lists.
177-182: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyinrenameList.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callingrenameList, as it now relies on this property for renaming lists.
Line range hint
203-220: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyinremoveList.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callingremoveList, as it now relies on this property for removing lists.
Line range hint
235-268: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyinupdateContractLocalInfo.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callingupdateContractLocalInfo, as it now relies on this property for updating contract local info.
350-351: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyingetRecentActivities.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callinggetRecentActivities, as it now relies on this property for retrieving recent activities.
113-114: Verify usage ofthis.userKeyingetAllTags.Ensure that
this.userKeyis correctly set before callinggetAllTags, as it now relies on this property for tag retrieval.Verification successful
Verification of
this.userKeyusage ingetAllTags.The
setContractUserKeymethod is used to setthis.userKey, and it is invoked within auseEffecthook insrc/lib/providers/network-guard/index.tsx. This setup ensures thatthis.userKeyis correctly set beforegetAllTagsis called. Therefore, the usage ofthis.userKeyin thegetAllTagsmethod appears to be correct.
- Location of
setContractUserKeyusage:
src/lib/providers/network-guard/index.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `this.userKey` is correctly set before calling `getAllTags`. # Test: Search for `setContractUserKey` method usage to ensure `this.userKey` is set. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'setContractUserKey'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `this.userKey` is correctly set before calling `getAllTags`. # Test: Search for `setContractUserKey` method usage to ensure `this.userKey` is set. rg --type ts -A 5 $'setContractUserKey'Length of output: 1695
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib/stores/code.test.ts (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/lib/stores/code.test.ts (4)
67-67: LGTM! VerifylastSavedCodes()implementation in context.The removal of user-specific arguments aligns with the new testing approach. Ensure that
lastSavedCodes()functions correctly in this context.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
lastSavedCodes()Implementation Functions CorrectlyThe
lastSavedCodes()method is implemented insrc/lib/stores/code.tsand is used in tests to assert expected behavior. This confirms that it functions correctly without requiring user-specific arguments. No further issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `lastSavedCodes()` in context to ensure it functions correctly without arguments. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: No user-specific logic. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function lastSavedCodes() { $$$ }'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `lastSavedCodes` method within classes or objects to verify its implementation. # Search for `lastSavedCodes` method within class or object contexts. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }' # Search for `lastSavedCodes` method within object contexts. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const $_ = { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrence of `lastSavedCodes` in the codebase to verify its implementation. # Search for `lastSavedCodes` in the entire codebase. rg 'lastSavedCodes'Length of output: 704
56-56: LGTM! VerifylastSavedCodes()implementation.The removal of user-specific arguments simplifies the test. Ensure that
lastSavedCodes()behaves correctly without arguments.Verification successful
Verification Complete:
lastSavedCodes()Method Functions CorrectlyThe
lastSavedCodesmethod insrc/lib/stores/code.tscorrectly handles the absence of saved codes by returning an empty array when no codes are saved for the current user key. This aligns with the test expectations and confirms that the method functions correctly without requiring arguments.
- Location:
src/lib/stores/code.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `lastSavedCodes()` to ensure it functions correctly without arguments. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: No user-specific logic. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function lastSavedCodes() { $$$ }'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `lastSavedCodes` as a method within classes or objects in TypeScript files. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const $_ = { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use ripgrep to search for `lastSavedCodes` across all TypeScript files to find its implementation or definition. rg 'lastSavedCodes' --type ts --context 5Length of output: 4089
77-77: LGTM! VerifylastSavedCodes()implementation.The removal of user-specific arguments simplifies the test case. Ensure that
lastSavedCodes()behaves correctly without arguments.Verification successful
Ensure
lastSavedCodes()Handles User Key AppropriatelyThe
lastSavedCodesmethod relies onthis.userKeyto function correctly. Verify that test cases cover scenarios with both set and unsetuserKey, ensuring the method's expected behavior.
- File:
src/lib/stores/code.ts- Method:
lastSavedCodes()Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `lastSavedCodes()` to ensure it functions correctly without arguments. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: No user-specific logic. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function lastSavedCodes() { $$$ }'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `lastSavedCodes` as a method within any class or object in TypeScript files. # Test: Search for the method definition in classes or objects. Expect: Locate the method implementation. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }' || ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const $_ = { $$$ lastSavedCodes() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrence of `lastSavedCodes` in TypeScript files to locate its definition. # Test: Use ripgrep to find occurrences of `lastSavedCodes`. Expect: Identify where it is defined or used. rg 'lastSavedCodes' --type ts -A 5Length of output: 2628
116-116: LGTM! VerifylastSavedCodeIds()implementation.The removal of user-specific arguments simplifies the test case. Ensure that
lastSavedCodeIds()behaves correctly without arguments.Verification successful
Implementation of
lastSavedCodeIds()is correct and consistent with its usage.The method
lastSavedCodeIdsis implemented to return a reversed slice ofthis.savedCodeIds[this.userKey]or an empty array, aligning with the test expectations. The removal of user-specific arguments is appropriate since the method relies on internal state.
- Code Location:
src/lib/stores/code.ts- Test Cases:
src/lib/stores/code.test.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `lastSavedCodeIds()` to ensure it functions correctly without arguments. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: No user-specific logic. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function lastSavedCodeIds() { $$$ }'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `lastSavedCodeIds` method within classes or objects in the codebase. # Test: Search for `lastSavedCodeIds` method implementation. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ lastSavedCodeIds() { $$$ } $$$ }' # Additionally, search for `lastSavedCodeIds` within object literals. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'{ $$$ lastSavedCodeIds: function() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search for `lastSavedCodeIds` to include arrow functions and imports/exports. # Search for `lastSavedCodeIds` as an arrow function. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const $_ = { $$$ lastSavedCodeIds: () => { $$$ } $$$ }' # Search for any imports or exports related to `lastSavedCodeIds`. rg 'lastSavedCodeIds' -A 3Length of output: 1388
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Tests