Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintenance: Bump versions across the board #1815

Closed
5 tasks done
thorstenhater opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 9 comments · Fixed by #2017
Closed
5 tasks done

Maintenance: Bump versions across the board #1815

thorstenhater opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 9 comments · Fixed by #2017
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@thorstenhater
Copy link
Contributor

thorstenhater commented Jan 26, 2022

We will remove support for the following in 0.7 0.8

  • python 3.6. EOL reached
  • CUDA 10
  • GCC 8
  • Clang 8
  • Apple 9

and bump these by one each.

@thorstenhater thorstenhater added this to the v0.7 milestone Jan 26, 2022
@brenthuisman
Copy link
Contributor

For Python we don't and shouldn't care about upstream EOL.

We have a set of criteria laid out here. At this moment, Ubuntu LTS-1 is 18.04 which comes with Python 3.6. v0.7 might roughly coincide with a new Ubuntu LTS, so I just might allow it :)

In any case, I'd like see, for each tool deprecation, whether or not it has consequences for the platforms we want to support.

@thorstenhater
Copy link
Contributor Author

Re: True, but that was the motivator.

Rest: all HPC systems we have access to are on CUDA11 now and we never liked GCC8 anyhow.

@bcumming
Copy link
Member

I endorse all the above deprecations.

@brenthuisman
Copy link
Contributor

Let's first close #1731.

@brenthuisman
Copy link
Contributor

For the moment: having Python 3.6 is helpful at Ebrains.

@brenthuisman brenthuisman modified the milestones: v0.7, v0.8 May 10, 2022
@brenthuisman brenthuisman self-assigned this Aug 2, 2022
@thorstenhater
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should absolutely be part of 0.8, these compilers are starting to reek.

@brenthuisman
Copy link
Contributor

brenthuisman commented Sep 1, 2022

At the past Dev Meet, no particular attachment to these compilers were raised (@llandsmeer will check if CUDA 10 is a potential problem, but he didn't think so). So, shall I +1 each of these?

@thorstenhater
Copy link
Contributor Author

YES! It's been orverdue to do that.

@llandsmeer
Copy link
Contributor

We're on CUDA 11.5 on the development machine, so should be fine

@thorstenhater thorstenhater pinned this issue Sep 8, 2022
brenthuisman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2022
- GCC: goes up to 9 from 8, needed by CUDA 11
- CUDA: goes up to 11 from 10
- Clang: 10 up from 8

Closes #1815
@thorstenhater thorstenhater unpinned this issue Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants