feat(aws-cloudformation): L2 implementation of AWS::CloudFormation::ResourceVersion

[695K0C9K1ZZmo6R]

Issue # (if applicable)

n/a

Reason for this change

CDK type implementation for the this resource to improve developer experience

Description of changes

L2 implementation of AWS::CloudFormation::ResourceVersion

• CF type https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-cloudformation-resourceversion.html
• creates log group + log access role if not provided
• param documentation taken from cloudformation docs
• accepts cdk 'assets' type for providing resource code instead of trying to manually provide the s3objectUrl

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

n/a (I believe?)

Description of how you validated changes

yes, added unit test around new construct. open to expanding it further if general approach looks good.

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Features must contain a change to a README file.
❌ Features must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.
❌ The title scope of the pull request should omit 'aws-' from the name of modified packages. Use 'cloudformation' instead of 'aws-cloudformation'.
❌ The first word of the pull request title should not be capitalized. If the title starts with a CDK construct, it should be in backticks "``".

If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request to a comment.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: d185888
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[695K0C9K1ZZmo6R]

Exemption Request

since this is a basic L2 implementation in an existing service subpackage, I dont believe a README update is necessary nor are integ tests

additionally, there is nothing in the README and the there are no integ tests for this subpackage

[GavinZZ]

Exemption Request

since this is a basic L2 implementation in an existing service subpackage, I dont believe a README update is necessary nor are integ tests

additionally, there is nothing in the README and the there are no integ tests for this subpackage

Thank you for the PR! However, I don't quite agree with this statement. IMO, we need to add README and integration tests to test the deployability and tell users who to use this new L2 construct. I would kindly ask you to include some integ tests and readme changes. Appreciate it!

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. Note that PRs with failing linting check or builds are not reviewed, please ensure your build is passing

To prevent automatic closure:

• Resume work on the PR
• OR request an exemption by adding a comment containing 'Exemption Request' with justification e.x "Exemption Request: "
• OR request clarification by adding a comment containing 'Clarification Request' with a question e.x "Clarification Request: "

This PR will automatically close in 7 days if no action is taken.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.