Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add synth & kwargs #288
feat: add synth & kwargs #288
Changes from 3 commits
8dd1bae
3fbc862
576dcc8
5476e97
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this function doesn't have a docstring right now, but I think it would be good to add one while we're here.
I'm skeptical on using
kwargs
here -- it is two extra optional parameters, but they're completely undocumented. Why not just addrole_prefix
andpolicy_prefix
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is intended.
kwargs
is an escape hatch and would allow us to pass any other parameters from Seed-Farmer (or any other tool) in the future without breaking backward-compatibility.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For what value? To decouple seed-farmer and code-seeder versions slightly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will this get mixed in with log output? Is that OK?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Redirecting this into a file i.e:
Doesn't mix it up with the log output and produces a valid template
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to have
synth
return the string template instead of the path?Right now there's a coupling that
synthesize=False
changes the output value. That looks like quite a refactor though, so maybe it isn't worth it. Probably just add an assertion underif not synthesize
thattemplate_filename
is non-None?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I considered refactoring this but did not want to make too intrusive changes. Good call about an assertion though.