Make modules public in http

[Sytten]

Description of changes

Make relevant modules public on llrt_http so people can craft their own module

Checklist

• Created unit tests in tests/unit and/or in Rust for my feature if needed
• Ran make fix to format JS and apply Clippy auto fixes
• Made sure my code didn't add any additional warnings: make check
• Added relevant type info in types/ directory
• Updated documentation if needed (API.md/README.md/Other)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[Sytten]

This allows a user to create it's own module if they dont want http in the root

use rquickjs::module::{Declarations, Exports, ModuleDef};
use rquickjs::{Class, Ctx, Result};

pub struct HttpModule;

impl ModuleDef for HttpModule {
    fn declare(declare: &Declarations) -> Result<()> {
        declare.declare("fetch")?;
        declare.declare(stringify!(Request))?;
        declare.declare(stringify!(Response))?;
        declare.declare(stringify!(Headers))?;
        declare.declare("Blob")?;
        declare.declare(stringify!(File))?;
        declare.declare("default")?;

        Ok(())
    }

    fn evaluate<'js>(ctx: &Ctx<'js>, exports: &Exports<'js>) -> Result<()> {
        llrt_utils::module::export_default(ctx, exports, |default| {
            llrt_http::fetch::init(ctx, default)?;

            Class::<llrt_http::request::Request>::define(default)?;
            Class::<llrt_http::response::Response>::define(default)?;
            Class::<llrt_http::headers::Headers>::define(default)?;

            llrt_http::blob::init(ctx, default)?;

            Class::<llrt_http::file::File>::define(default)?;

            Ok(())
        })?;

        Ok(())
    }
}

[nabetti1720]

Personally, I believe that the name llrt_http is likely to be mistaken for being compatible with the Node.js http module. Something like llrt_fetch or llrt_libhttp would be preferable. :)

[Sytten]

I can rename the whole folder I agree

[richarddavison]

@Sytten can you please rebase and rename the directory?

[Sytten]

@richarddavison I was kinda of waiting to see if we adopted the new module system.

[nabetti1720]

Personally, I believe that the name llrt_http is likely to be mistaken for being compatible with the Node.js http module. Something like llrt_fetch or llrt_libhttp would be preferable. :)

@Sytten , I think llrt_fetch is more intuitive and easier to understand. Can we move forward again on this issue?