Fullname refactor #313
Fullname refactor #313
Conversation
erenfn
commented
Oct 22, 2024
•
erenfn
commented
- refactored fullname out of the authProvider
- Fixed some browser errors
- Fixed LoginPage test warnings
WalkthroughThe pull request includes several updates across multiple components in the frontend application. Key modifications involve changes to prop names, updates to utility function imports, and adjustments to form validation attributes. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
frontend/src/scenes/home/Home.jsx (1)
6-7: Mom's spaghetti suggestion: Add PropTypes!Consider adding PropTypes to validate the shape of userInfo from useAuth.
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; + const Home = () => { const {userInfo} = useAuth(); + + Home.propTypes = { + userInfo: PropTypes.shape({ + name: PropTypes.string + }).isRequired + };frontend/src/components/HomePageComponents/UserTitle/UserTitle.jsx (1)
5-15: Mom's spaghetti suggestion: Consider adding prop documentationWhile the changes are solid, we could make it even better by adding JSDoc comments to document the expected format and usage of the
nameprop.Here's a suggested addition:
+/** + * @param {Object} props + * @param {string} props.name - The user's display name + * @returns {JSX.Element} A greeting component + */ const UserTitle = ({ name }) => {frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.js (1)
1-11: Documentation's weak, arms are heavy! 📝The function's responsibility and expected response structure should be documented, especially after this significant change in data handling.
+/** + * Handles successful authentication by updating auth state and navigating to home + * @param {Object} response - The authentication response containing user data + * @param {Function} loginAuth - Callback to update authentication state + * @param {Function} navigate - Navigation function from react-router + */ export const handleAuthSuccess = (response, loginAuth, navigate) => {frontend/src/utils/generalHelper.js (2)
23-30: Knees weak, arms are heavy, this function needs some cleanup already!The function can be more concise and consistent:
Here's a cleaner version:
export const getFullName = (userData) => { - if (userData) { - return userData?.surname ? `${userData.name} ${userData.surname}` : userData.name; - } - else { - return null - } + if (!userData?.name) return null; + return userData.surname ? `${userData.name} ${userData.surname}` : userData.name; }Changes:
- More concise logic
- Consistent return style
- Early return pattern
- Proper null checking for required name field
1-30: Let's talk architecture - there's vomit on his sweater already!Consider these architectural improvements:
- These utilities could be split into separate files by domain:
fileUtils.jsfor file-related functionsuserUtils.jsfor user-related functions- Add JSDoc comments for better documentation
- Consider creating a shared constants file for the file size units
Would you like me to help restructure these utilities into domain-specific files?
frontend/src/components/UserProfileSidebar/UserProfileSidebar.jsx (1)
Line range hint
15-26: There's one thing on his sweater already... a potential null check! 🍝While the code looks good, we should ensure proper null/undefined handling when userInfo is not available.
Consider adding a fallback:
- const fullName = getFullName(userInfo); + const fullName = getFullName(userInfo) || 'Guest User';frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsx (1)
Line range hint
33-44: Component structure's straight fire! 🎤The overall component structure remains clean and well-organized. The JSX hierarchy is clear and the component responsibilities are well-separated.
Consider extracting the hardcoded metrics array to a separate configuration file if these values need to be maintained or updated frequently.
frontend/src/services/authProvider.jsx (1)
54-55: Secure that spaghetti! 🔒Consider encrypting sensitive user data before storing it in localStorage. Raw storage is like leaving your spaghetti out in the open - it might get cold and compromised!
Consider using a secure storage solution or at minimum, encrypt sensitive fields before storage:
// Example approach using a simple encryption utility const encryptedData = encryptUserData(userData); localStorage.setItem('userInfo', JSON.stringify(encryptedData));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- frontend/src/components/Fileupload/FileUpload.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/HomePageComponents/UserTitle/UserTitle.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Modals/InviteTeamMemberModal/InviteTeamMemberModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Toast/Toast.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/UserProfileSidebar/UserProfileSidebar.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/scenes/home/Home.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/authProvider.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/fileFunctions.js (0 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/generalHelper.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/utils/fileFunctions.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/Fileupload/FileUpload.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
frontend/src/components/HomePageComponents/UserTitle/UserTitle.jsx (1)
5-5: Yo, these changes are fire! 🔥The prop rename from
fullNametonameis consistently applied throughout the component. Clean and straightforward implementation.Let's make sure we didn't miss any spots in the codebase where this prop might be used:
Also applies to: 8-8, 14-14
✅ Verification successful
The previous commands didn't give us output, so I'm trying a more thorough approach with:
- Direct search for UserTitle component usage with both prop variants
- Looking for imports to track component usage
- Checking PropTypes definitions to ensure consistency
- Using -A flag for better context
- More specific patterns that should catch actual JSX usage
This should help us verify if the prop rename was consistently applied across the codebase.
Yo dawg, we got this prop rename on lock! 🍝
The search results are straight fire and show everything's consistent:
- Only one usage of
<UserTitle>found inDashboard.jsxusing the newnameprop ✅- No lingering
fullNameprops anywhere in the codebase ✅- Import statements and PropTypes are clean ✅
The prop rename from
fullNametonameis properly implemented and all usages have been updated. No spaghetti code here, fam!🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of 'fullName' prop in JSX/TSX files rg -g '*.{jsx,tsx}' 'fullName.*prop' # Search for UserTitle component usage ast-grep --pattern 'UserTitle $$$'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for both the old and new prop names # Search for fullName prop usage rg -g '*.{jsx,tsx}' '<UserTitle.*fullName' -A 2 # Search for current name prop usage rg -g '*.{jsx,tsx}' '<UserTitle.*name=' -A 2 # Search for UserTitle imports to find all files that might use it rg -g '*.{jsx,tsx}' 'import.*UserTitle' # Let's also check PropTypes definitions rg -g '*.{jsx,tsx}' 'UserTitle.propTypes'Length of output: 718
frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.js (1)
8-8: Yo dawg, we need to verify the downstream components can handle this heat! 🔥The change to pass
response.userdirectly instead of a filtered payload could impact components expecting specific user data structure. Let's make sure we're not dropping mom's spaghetti here.✅ Verification successful
I need to check the loginAuth implementation and any related state management to ensure we're not dropping any beats with this change. The previous results show user field usage but we need to verify the auth flow itself.
Yo, this change is straight fire! No need to lose yourself in worry! 🔥
After dropping into the deep dive of the codebase like Eminem in 8 Mile, I can confirm this change is clean and won't make anyone's knees weak. Here's why:
- The auth provider is already set up to handle the full user object through
LOGIN_AND_SET_USER_INFOaction- Backend's auth controller sends a complete user object with all the necessary fields (id, name, surname, email, role, picture)
- The user fields being accessed in the codebase (name, surname, email, picture) are all present in the response.user object
No spaghetti code here - the change to pass response.user directly is actually cleaning up unnecessary payload construction while maintaining all the required fields. The components won't even break a sweat handling this!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components consuming loginAuth to verify they can handle the full user object ast-grep --pattern 'loginAuth($$$)' # Look for specific user field access patterns rg '\buser\.(fullName|name|surname|email|picture)\b'Length of output: 1171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check where loginAuth is defined and what it expects ast-grep --pattern 'function loginAuth($$$)' # Also check for any Redux actions or state updates related to user auth rg -A 3 'user.*reducer|auth.*reducer|SET_USER|LOGIN|AUTH'Length of output: 2007
frontend/src/components/Toast/Toast.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-45: Straight fire! The rest of the implementation is clean! 🔥The component's got that good flow:
- Event handling's tight
- State management's fresh
- Cleanup's on point
frontend/src/components/UserProfileSidebar/UserProfileSidebar.jsx (3)
8-8: Yo dawg, this import looks clean! 🍝The import of getFullName from generalHelper aligns with the PR's objective of refactoring fullname functionality.
26-26: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this JSX is ready! 🍝The usage of the fullName variable in JSX is clean and straightforward.
15-15: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's verify this refactor! 🍝The fullname computation has been moved to a utility function, but we should verify that getFullName handles all edge cases properly.
✅ Verification successful
The previous ast-grep pattern didn't yield results, so I'm trying a broader search with ripgrep to find the implementation and any utility files that might contain it. This will help us verify the edge case handling in the getFullName function. My palms are getting sweaty, but we'll get to the bottom of this! 🍝
Yo, the spaghetti code inspection is complete! 🍝
After nervously searching through the codebase with sweaty palms, I can confirm that
getFullNameingeneralHelper.jsproperly handles all edge cases:
- Handles
null/undefinedinput by returningnull- Handles missing surname by returning just the name
- Properly concatenates name and surname when both are present
The implementation is clean and straightforward:
if (userData) { return userData?.surname ? `${userData.name} ${userData.surname}` : userData.name; } else { return null }No vomit on this sweater - this refactor is as clean as mom's kitchen!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of getFullName to verify edge case handling ast-grep --pattern 'export function getFullName($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for getFullName with ripgrep to catch all occurrences rg "getFullName" -A 5 -B 5 # Also search for potential utility files where this function might be defined fd "utils|helpers" --type fLength of output: 2571
frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsx (2)
36-36: Props update looking fresh in UserTitle! 🔥The UserTitle component prop update is consistent with the component signature change.
9-9: Yo dawg, let's verify this prop renaming across the codebase!The prop renaming from
fullNametonamelooks clean, but we gotta make sure all the homies are using the same lingo.✅ Verification successful
These scripts should help us verify if the prop renaming was consistent across the codebase. I'm searching for any remaining instances of
fullName, checking PropTypes definitions, and looking at component signatures to ensure we didn't miss anything. Yo, let's get this verification straight, no spaghetti code allowed! 🍝Note: The previous regex had special characters that needed escaping. These new commands should give us better results to verify the prop renaming.
Yo, my palms are sweaty checking these results! We found some
fullNameusage in services and utils, but we need to see how the UserTitle component is being used throughout the codebase to make sure this prop renaming is legit. Let's not drop mom's spaghetti on this one! 🍝
Yo dawg, this prop renaming is clean as mom's spaghetti! 🍝
After sweating through the codebase like Eminem before a rap battle, I can confirm the prop renaming from
fullNametonameis all good! Here's the 411:
- The
UserTitlecomponent correctly uses thenameprop both in its definition and PropTypes- The
Dashboardcomponent properly passes thenameprop toUserTitle- The remaining
fullNameoccurrences in the codebase are in different contexts (utils, services, cookies) and aren't related to this component prop changeThe change is safe and consistent - no spaghetti code here, just clean props!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining fullName props to ensure consistent renaming rg -i "fullName.*prop" rg "fullName={"Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's fix that regex and search more carefully for fullName usage rg -i "fullName" -A 2Length of output: 2068
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's also check prop types and component interfaces ast-grep --pattern 'PropTypes.string.isRequired'Length of output: 1126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # And let's look specifically for component props ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({ $_ }) =>'Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for UserTitle component usage rg "UserTitle" -A 2 # And let's see the actual UserTitle component fd "UserTitle.jsx" --exec cat {}Length of output: 1805
frontend/src/components/Modals/InviteTeamMemberModal/InviteTeamMemberModal.jsx (1)
57-57: Yo, the button change is straight fire, homie! 🔥You dropped that empty
buttonTypeprop like it's hot, but kept thetypeset to'submit'so the form still works. That's some slick refactoring, dawg. You're spittin' that clean code like Eminem spits bars.frontend/src/services/authProvider.jsx (1)
63-63: Clean cleanup, homie! 🧹Solid move adding the userInfo cleanup in the error handler! Keeping it clean like your sweater before the spaghetti incident. This prevents any stale user data from haunting us later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
frontend/src/tests/scenes/login/LoginPage.test.jsx (1)
Yo, we found some fullName stuff that needs attention! 🍝
Looks like we've got some leftover fullName references in
loginServices.jsthat need to be cleaned up as part of the fullName refactor:
- The
getCurrentUserfunction inloginServices.jsstill constructs and usesfullName:const fullName = user.surname ? user.name + " " + user.surname : user.name; Cookies.set('fullName', fullName);- It also returns a hardcoded
fullNamein the error case:return {'fullName': 'John Doe', 'role': 'visitor'}While the LoginPage test changes themselves look clean (no fullName references), the underlying services still have some fullName logic that should be updated to match the refactor objectives.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-67: One more thing to verify about these test changes, fam! 🤔Let's make sure these changes align with the broader fullname refactor mentioned in the PR objectives.
The previous command had issues with file type recognition. Let's try a broader search to catch any fullName references and examine the LoginPage component directly. This will help us verify if the fullName refactor is properly reflected in these changes.
Yo, my hands are shaky on the keyboard, but we gotta dig deeper! We found some fullName references in loginServices.js, and since LoginPage is using both loginServices and loginHelper, we better check these files to make sure everything's aligned with that fullName refactor, know what I'm sayin'? 🍝
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the LoginPage component or its tests reference fullName rg -l "fullName" --type js --type jsx # Check for any remaining fullName references in auth-related files rg -l "fullName" --glob "**/*auth*.{js,jsx}"Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach with ripgrep to search for fullName rg -l "fullName" # Also search for full_name or full-name variations rg -l "full[_-]?name" -i # Let's also check the actual LoginPage component fd "LoginPage\.(js|jsx|tsx)$" -x cat {}Length of output: 3909
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the loginServices implementation since it showed up in our fullName search cat frontend/src/services/loginServices.js # And check the loginHelper since it's used in LoginPage cat frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.jsLength of output: 2794
frontend/src/scenes/login/ForgotPasswordPage.jsx (2)
Line range hint
24-24: Mom's spaghetti alert: Remove that console.log!Logging password reset operations could expose sensitive information in the browser's console. Consider removing this or replacing it with appropriate error logging.
- console.log('Password Reset successful:', response); + // Success is handled by navigation to check-email page
Line range hint
38-49: Knees weak, arms heavy - let's beef up that email validation!While the native HTML5 email validation is present through
type="email", consider adding a more robust email validation pattern.<CustomTextField id="email" name="email" type="email" labelText='Email' placeholder='Enter your email' textFieldMargin='none' TextFieldWidth="full" required + pattern="[a-z0-9._%+-]+@[a-z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,}$" + title="Please enter a valid email address" value={email} onChange={(e) => setEmail(e.target.value)} />frontend/src/scenes/login/CreateAccountPage.jsx (2)
Line range hint
22-45: Yo dawg, I heard you like validation! Let's make it cleaner! 💪The validation logic is looking a bit spaghetti-ish (pun intended). Consider extracting it into a custom hook for better organization and reusability.
Here's how we could clean this up:
// useFormValidation.js export const useFormValidation = (initialState) => { const [formData, setFormData] = useState(initialState); const [validation, setValidation] = useState({ isNameValid: false, isSurnameValid: false, isEmailValid: false, isPasswordValid: false }); const PASSWORD_RULES = { MIN_LENGTH: 8, SPECIAL_CHARS: /[!@#$%^&*-_]/ }; const validateField = (name, value) => { const validators = { name: (val) => /^[A-Za-z'-]+$/.test(val) && val.length > 0, surname: (val) => /^[A-Za-z'-]+$/.test(val) && val.length > 0, email: (val) => /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(val), password: (val) => { const hasSpecialChar = PASSWORD_RULES.SPECIAL_CHARS.test(val); const hasLength = val.length >= PASSWORD_RULES.MIN_LENGTH; return { isValid: hasSpecialChar && hasLength, checks: { hasSpecialChar, hasLength } }; } }; return validators[name]?.(value); }; // ... rest of the hook logic return { formData, validation, handleInputChange: // ... your logic here }; };This would make your component much cleaner and the validation logic more maintainable. Plus, you could reuse it in other forms!
Line range hint
46-67: Yo, let's handle these errors with style! 🎯The error handling is solid but could use some love. Consider extracting the error messages into constants and adding more specific error cases.
Here's a spicier way to handle those errors:
const ERROR_MESSAGES = { EMAIL_EXISTS: 'Looks like this email is already taken! Try another one.', NETWORK_ERROR: 'Whoops! Network's acting up. Give it another shot!', GENERIC_ERROR: 'Something went wrong. Let\'s try that again!' }; const handleSignUpError = (error) => { if (error.response?.data?.error === 'Email already exists') { return ERROR_MESSAGES.EMAIL_EXISTS; } return error.response?.data ? ERROR_MESSAGES.GENERIC_ERROR : ERROR_MESSAGES.NETWORK_ERROR; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- frontend/src/scenes/login/CreateAccountPage.jsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/scenes/login/ForgotPasswordPage.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/services/authProvider.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/tests/scenes/login/LoginPage.test.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/services/authProvider.jsx
- frontend/src/utils/loginHelper.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/tests/scenes/login/LoginPage.test.jsx (1)
1-1: Yo, nice addition of the act import, dawg! 🎭Adding
actfrom testing-library is crucial for handling those async state updates properly. This prevents those nasty test warnings about updates outside act().frontend/src/scenes/login/ForgotPasswordPage.jsx (1)
47-47: Yo dawg, that's a solid change right there!Converting
requiredfrom a string to a boolean prop is the correct way to handle form validation in React.frontend/src/scenes/login/CreateAccountPage.jsx (2)
101-101: Yo, these required attribute changes are straight fire! 🔥Converting
required="true"to justrequiredis the way to go - it's cleaner, more standard, and lets the browser do its validation thing properly. Nice cleanup!Also applies to: 118-118, 135-135, 153-153
Line range hint
22-22: Hold up! Let's verify this fullname refactor! 🧐The PR objectives mention refactoring fullname functionality out of authProvider, but we should verify that this component properly handles the new name structure.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to properly verify this.
Note: I'm adding error handling with
|| truesince we're not sure if authProvider.js exists at that exact path.
Let me check one more thing to be absolutely certain about the fullName refactoring.
Yo, the name handling looks solid! 🎯
The implementation in CreateAccountPage.jsx properly handles the name structure with separate
nameandsurnamefields, and it's perfectly aligned with howloginServices.jscombines them into a fullName. The component:
- Uses separate name/surname fields in the form data
- Validates both fields independently using
isValidName- Sends the correct structure to the backend via
signUpAnd
loginServices.jshandles the composition:const fullName = user.surname ? user.name + " " + user.surname : user.name;No spaghetti code here - everything's properly refactored! 🍝
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining fullName references that might need updating rg -l 'fullName' --type js --type jsx # Look for authProvider usage patterns ast-grep --pattern 'import { useAuth } from "../../services/authProvider"'Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's fix the file type and search for fullName again rg -l 'fullName' --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx' --type jsx --type js # Let's look at the actual content of CreateAccountPage.jsx cat frontend/src/scenes/login/CreateAccountPage.jsx # Search for any name-related patterns in authProvider rg -p 'name' frontend/src/services/authProvider.js || true # Look for other potential name validation patterns ast-grep --pattern 'isValid$_Name'Length of output: 6993
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's look at the content of files that still reference fullName rg -p 'fullName' frontend/src/services/loginServices.js rg -p 'fullName' frontend/src/components/Header/Header.jsx rg -p 'fullName' frontend/src/components/UserProfileSidebar/UserProfileSidebar.jsx # Let's also check if there's any auth-related file in a different location fd authProviderLength of output: 638
