397 create ip check #400
397 create ip check #400
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces IP filtering middleware for the backend application. The changes involve adding new environment variables across different configuration files ( Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
Client->>+Server: HTTP Request
Server->>+IPFilter: Check IP
alt IP is Allowed
IPFilter-->>Server: Allow Request
Server->>+Application: Process Request
else IP is Not Allowed
IPFilter-->>Client: 401 Unauthorized
end
Possibly Related PRs
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/src/middleware/ipFilter.middleware.js (3)
1-5: Beware of potential IPv6 addresses.
Currently, we're forcing IPv4 by stripping out the “::ffff:” prefix. If you expect IPv6 traffic, we could inadvertently cause unauthorized rejections. Consider adding robust IPv6 handling to avoid sweaty palms if your app grows to support IPv6.
7-21: Validate environment input more gracefully.
Parsing the IP range by splitting on “, ” may fail if the environment variable is missing or doesn't follow the exact spacing. Consider a safer approach like.split(",")and trimming each entry.
23-38: Ensure no meltdown with large IP ranges.
Looping over each range is fine for smaller sets, but watch for performance if these ranges expand. We might use an IP range library to avoid sudden mom’s-spaghetti moments under high load.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
backend/.env(1 hunks)backend/.env.production(1 hunks)backend/.env.test(1 hunks)backend/src/middleware/ipFilter.middleware.js(1 hunks)backend/src/server.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/.env
- backend/src/server.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/.env.production (1)
14-16: Confirm production IPs are correct.
Double-check these ranges and addresses for your real production environment. If they’re misconfigured, you’ll lock out legitimate traffic, and that’s some real spaghetti on your sweater.
backend/.env.test (1)
18-20: Test environment alignment.
Including 127.0.0.1 is great for local testing. Ensure the rest of these addresses and ranges match up with your test scenarios to avoid unexpected blocking.
Describe your changes
Briefly describe the changes you made and their purpose.
Issue number
Mention the issue number(s) this PR addresses (e.g., #123).
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review:
When IP is not in the Allowed IPs
When IP is in the Allowed IPs or the env variable is not present