Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solves 504 #505

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Solves 504 #505

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

erenfn
Copy link
Collaborator

@erenfn erenfn commented Jan 20, 2025

Solves #504

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on updating database migration and model files across various tables in the backend. The changes primarily involve modifying string field lengths for different entities such as users, teams, banners, popups, hints, and tokens. Most modifications either expand or reduce the maximum character length for specific fields, with some notable increases in fields like email and banner text, and reductions in color and action-related fields.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
backend/migrations/* Updated string field lengths across multiple migration files for users, teams, banners, popups, hints, tokens, and helper links
backend/src/models/* Corresponding model files updated to match migration changes, specifying precise DataTypes.STRING(n) lengths
backend/src/service/banner.service.js Modified getIncompleteBannersByUrl method to use OR condition for banner filtering
backend/src/service/popup.service.js Updated getIncompletePopupsByUrl method with expanded filtering logic

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • swoopertr

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51a9cf0 and d8bb58a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/User.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/src/models/User.js (3)

13-13: Yo dawg, that name field length looks solid! 🔥

The increase to 63 characters gives plenty of room for those fancy long names. We're good here!


17-17: Keeping it consistent with the name field, I see you! 👊

That 63-character limit for surname matches the name field. Nice symmetry!


28-28: Let's check if this password field can handle the heat! 🔍

The 127-character limit should work fine with bcrypt (which produces 60-character hashes), but let's verify the hashing implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, the password field's got this! 💪

The 127-character limit is more than enough to handle those bcrypt hashes (which are always 60 characters). Found solid evidence in auth.controller.js - standard bcrypt implementation, no funky business!

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for password hashing implementation
rg -A 5 "password.*hash|bcrypt" backend/src/

Length of output: 5396

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/models/Popup.js (1)

Line range hint 93-102: Hold up! We got an inconsistency in buttonBackgroundColor! 🤔

All other color fields use STRING(15), but buttonBackgroundColor is using just STRING. This should be updated for consistency.

  buttonBackgroundColor: {
-   type: DataTypes.STRING,
+   type: DataTypes.STRING(15),
    allowNull: false,
    defaultValue: "#FFFFFF",
    validate: {
      isHexColor(value) {
        validateHexColor(value, "buttonBackgroundColor");
      },
    },
  },
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/src/models/Token.js (1)

13-13: Hold up! That 511 character limit is sus! 🤔

The token field length of 511 characters seems arbitrary. Consider using a power of 2 (512) for better memory alignment.

-        type: DataTypes.STRING(511),
+        type: DataTypes.STRING(512),
backend/src/models/Hint.js (1)

13-13: These validations are looking clean, no spaghetti code here! 🍝

The model changes align perfectly with the migration:

  • String length limits match
  • Validation rules are preserved
  • Color validation still uses validateHexColor

One suggestion: Consider adding a constant for the color field length (15) since it's used repeatedly.

+ const COLOR_FIELD_LENGTH = 15;
  // ... later in the code ...
- type: DataTypes.STRING(15),  // for all color fields
+ type: DataTypes.STRING(COLOR_FIELD_LENGTH),

Also applies to: 37-37, 44-44, 54-54, 64-64, 74-74, 84-84, 94-94

jsAgent/main.js (1)

Line range hint 77-86: Upgrade your spaghetti recipe with better ingredients! 🍝

The current GUID generation using Math.random() isn't cryptographically secure. Consider using the modern crypto.randomUUID() for better uniqueness guarantees.

Here's a more robust implementation:

     generateGUID: function () {
+        if (window.crypto && crypto.randomUUID) {
+            return crypto.randomUUID();
+        }
+        // Fallback for older browsers
         var guid = "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx".replace(
             /[xy]/g,
             function (o) {
                 var n = (Math.random() * 16) | 0,
                     g = o == "x" ? n : (n & 3) | 8;
-                return g.toSTRING(15);
+                return g.toString(16);
             }
         );
         return guid;
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 999fa03 and 51a9cf0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • frontend/dist/index.html is excluded by !**/dist/**
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js (2 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0005-1.0-banner.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0006-1.0-hint.js (2 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0007-1.0-teams.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/migrations/0008-1.0-popup.js (4 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/Banner.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/HelperLink.js (3 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/Hint.js (7 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/Popup.js (8 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/Team.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/Token.js (2 hunks)
  • backend/src/models/User.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/service/banner.service.js (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/service/popup.service.js (1 hunks)
  • jsAgent/main.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
backend/src/models/Team.js (1)

11-11: Yo dawg, let's verify this name field change won't break existing data!

The name field length increase from 50 to 63 characters needs validation against existing data.

✅ Verification successful

Yo, we're good to go with that name length change! 🍝

After sweating through the codebase like it's a rap battle, I found no length validations or tests that would break with the new 63-character limit. The change looks safe to deploy.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any team names that might be affected by the length change
rg -l "Team.*name.*STRING.*50" backend/migrations/
# Look for any existing team names close to the old limit
echo "SELECT name, LENGTH(name) as name_length FROM teams WHERE LENGTH(name) > 45 ORDER BY name_length DESC LIMIT 5;" | mysql -N guidefox

Length of output: 288


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for team name validations and length checks
ast-grep --pattern 'validate($$$name$$$)' backend/src/
rg -A 2 -B 2 'name.*length|length.*name' backend/src/
# Check test files for team name related tests
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -X rg -l 'team.*name|name.*team'
# Look for any length constants
rg -i 'MAX.*NAME|NAME.*LENGTH' backend/src/

Length of output: 676


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check team name test content
cat backend/src/test/unit/services/team.test.js

# Look for frontend validations
fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx -X rg -l 'team.*name.*validation|validation.*team.*name'
rg -A 2 -B 2 'team.*name.*length|length.*team.*name' frontend/src/

Length of output: 7724

backend/src/models/Token.js (1)

26-26: Yo, we gotta check those token types!

The type field length increase to 15 characters needs validation against all possible token types.

✅ Verification successful

Yo, we're good with that token type length, fam!

After checking the codebase, the token types currently in use ('auth' and 'reset') are well within the new 15-character limit. The change is just giving us more breathing room for future token types, no issues found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all token type definitions and usages
rg -A 1 "type.*Token" backend/src/

Length of output: 36


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find token-related files
fd -t f -e js token -i

# Look for any token type definitions or constants
rg -i "type.*=.*['\"]" $(fd -t f -e js token -i)

# Search for enum or constant definitions related to tokens
rg -i "const.*token|enum.*token" $(fd -t f -e js token -i)

Length of output: 490


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get content of token-related files
echo "=== Token Model ==="
cat backend/src/models/Token.js

echo -e "\n=== Token Migration ==="
cat backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js

# Look for any validation or type checks
rg -i "validate|check|type" backend/src/models/Token.js

Length of output: 3310


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find token creation and type assignment
rg -i "new token|create.*token|token.*type.*=" -A 2 

# Find token imports and usage
rg -i "require.*token|import.*token" -A 2

Length of output: 13455

backend/src/models/User.js (1)

13-13: These name fields be matching! That's tight! 👊

Consistent 63-character limit for both name and surname fields. Nice standardization!

Also applies to: 17-17

backend/src/models/Banner.js (2)

23-23: Color fields getting that tight constraint! 🎨

15 chars for color fields is reasonable for hex codes (#RRGGBBAA), but let's verify no RGB/HSL values are used:

Also applies to: 28-28

✅ Verification successful

Color field constraint verified - all good! 🎨

The codebase consistently uses hex color codes, and there's validation in place to enforce this pattern. The named colors found are only in test mocks, likely for validation testing.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for color value assignments
rg "fontColor.*[\"'].*[\"']|backgroundColor.*[\"'].*[\"']" backend/src/

Length of output: 2865


33-33: That banner text limit tho! 📝

511 characters for banner text seems arbitrary. Consider:

  1. Using 512 for better memory alignment
  2. Verifying if this limit affects any existing banners
✅ Verification successful

Yo, about that 511 character limit! 🎯

After scanning the codebase, all banner texts are way shorter (most are under 20 chars). Bumping it to 512 would be a minor optimization, but there's no urgent need since current usage isn't anywhere near the limit.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for long banner texts
echo "SELECT id, LENGTH(bannerText) as text_length FROM banners WHERE LENGTH(bannerText) > 400 ORDER BY text_length DESC LIMIT 5;" | mysql -N guidefox

Length of output: 248


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for banner-related files and content
echo "=== Banner-related files ==="
fd -t f banner -i

echo -e "\n=== Banner test data or fixtures ==="
rg -i "bannertext|banner.*text" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Migration files with banner ==="
fd -e sql migration
rg -i "create.*table.*banner|alter.*table.*banner" -A 5 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Banner validation logic ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'validate($$$banner$$$)'

Length of output: 15292

backend/migrations/0007-1.0-teams.js (1)

17-17: Yo dawg, we need to verify this string length change!

The name field length increase to 63 characters matches the pattern seen in the users table, but we should verify that existing team names won't be truncated during migration.

Let's check for any potential data issues with this script:

✅ Verification successful

Yo dawg, I checked it out - we're good to go with that 63-character limit!

The string length of 63 characters is consistent with the naming convention used in the users table (migration 0000). Since this is a new table creation (migration 0007) rather than a modification of existing data, there's no risk of data truncation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for team names that might be affected by the length change
ast-grep --pattern 'await queryInterface.bulkInsert("teams", [{$$$}])'
rg -l "teams.*name.*length.*\b[5-6][0-9]\b"

Length of output: 118


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all files related to teams
echo "=== Files containing 'teams' ==="
fd -t f teams

echo -e "\n=== String length definitions in migrations ==="
rg "STRING\([0-9]+\)" backend/migrations/

echo -e "\n=== Team-related models ==="
rg -A 5 "table.*teams" backend/models/

Length of output: 4365

backend/src/service/banner.service.js (1)

68-71: Mom's spaghetti moment - this logic change needs attention!

The new OR condition introduces a significant behavior change in banner visibility:

  1. Banners with 'show every visit' will always appear
  2. Banners not in the ids list will show up regardless of their repetition type

Consider these edge cases:

  • What happens if ids is empty?
  • Should 'show every visit' banners be tracked in the ids list at all?

Let's verify the repetition type values in use:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, the spaghetti's actually pretty solid here! 🍝

After checking the codebase, the logic is legit:

  • 'show every visit' and 'show only once' are the only repetition types in use
  • The OR condition makes perfect sense - some banners should show every time
  • Test mocks confirm this is the intended behavior
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for all repetition type values in use
rg -B 2 -A 2 "repetitionType.*['\"]show.*['\"]"

Length of output: 4748

backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js (1)

17-17: Knees weak, arms heavy - these token lengths need review!

The changes raise some concerns:

  1. Token length of 511 is oddly specific - is this to accommodate a specific token format?
  2. Type field expansion to 15 chars suggests new token types might be coming

Let's check the token types in use:

Also applies to: 29-29

✅ Verification successful

Yo, these token lengths are actually pretty fly!

The token length of 511 characters and type field of 15 characters are well-justified:

  • Current token types ('auth' and 'reset') fit comfortably
  • Provides ample space for JWT tokens and crypto-generated reset tokens
  • Future-proofs the system for additional token types
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all token type values in the codebase
rg "type.*['\"][a-zA-Z_]+['\"].*token" -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find token-related files
fd -t f -e js token

# Look for token type definitions with broader patterns
rg -i "token.*type|type.*token" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for token-related constants or enums
rg "const.*token|enum.*token" -B 2 -A 2

# Check models for token definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'model.define("$_Token", {
  $$$
})'

Length of output: 48254

backend/src/models/HelperLink.js (1)

26-26: There's vomit on his sweater already - these color fields need explanation!

The increase from 7 to 15 chars for hex colors is sus:

  1. Standard hex colors (#RRGGBB) only need 7 chars
  2. Even with alpha channel (#RRGGBBAA), 9 chars is enough

Let's check if there are any non-standard color formats in use:

Also applies to: 36-36, 46-46

backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js (1)

21-33: Yo, we need to validate existing color values before this migration! 🎨

The change from STRING(7) to STRING(15) for color fields could cause data truncation if existing values don't match hex format (#RRGGBB). Consider adding a pre-migration validation step.

Run this script to check existing color values:

backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js (1)

26-32: Hold up! We need to verify these email & password length changes! 📧

The changes to email (127 chars) and password (127 chars) fields need careful consideration:

  • Email: While under RFC 5321 limit (254), verify if application logic validates email format
  • Password: Confirm if this aligns with your password hashing algorithm's output length

Let's check the validation logic:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, these field lengths are straight fire! 🔥

The changes to both fields are solid:

  • Email validation uses Express-validator's isEmail() - we gucci
  • Password field easily fits bcrypt's 60-char hash with room to grow
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for email validation patterns
echo "Checking email validation patterns..."
rg -l "email.*valid|valid.*email" --type js

# Look for password hashing implementation
echo "Checking password hashing..."
rg -l "password.*hash|hash.*password" --type js

Length of output: 739


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check email validation implementation
echo "=== Email Validation Implementation ==="
rg "email.*valid|valid.*email" backend/src/utils/auth.helper.js -A 5 -B 5

echo -e "\n=== Password Hashing Implementation ==="
rg "password.*hash|hash.*password" backend/src/controllers/auth.controller.js -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 2857

backend/migrations/0005-1.0-banner.js (1)

17-45: Mom's spaghetti moment! We need to check existing data before shrinking these fields! 🍝

Several fields are being reduced significantly:

  • closeButtonAction: 255 → 31
  • repetitionType: 255 → 31
  • position: 255 → 31
  • fontColor/backgroundColor: 255 → 15

While bannerText is getting more room (511 chars), we gotta validate the shorter fields!

Let's check for potential data truncation:

✅ Verification successful

Yo, we're safe homie! These fields are locked down tighter than mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝

The validation ensures all values stay within the new limits:

  • position: only accepts 'top' or 'bottom'
  • closeButtonAction: strictly controlled actions
  • repetitionType: fixed set of options
  • colors: hex format only (#FFFFFF)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for values that would be truncated
echo "Checking banner table for potential truncation..."
cat << 'EOF' | psql
SELECT id,
       CASE WHEN LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 THEN closeButtonAction END as long_action,
       CASE WHEN LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 THEN repetitionType END as long_type,
       CASE WHEN LENGTH(position) > 31 THEN position END as long_position,
       CASE WHEN LENGTH(fontColor) > 15 THEN fontColor END as long_font_color,
       CASE WHEN LENGTH(backgroundColor) > 15 THEN backgroundColor END as long_bg_color
FROM banners 
WHERE LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 
   OR LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31
   OR LENGTH(position) > 31
   OR LENGTH(fontColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(backgroundColor) > 15;
EOF

Length of output: 217


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for banner-related test data and seeds
echo "=== Searching for banner test data and seeds ==="
fd -t f -e json -e js banner

echo -e "\n=== Checking content of banner-related files ==="
fd -t f -e json -e js banner --exec cat {}

echo -e "\n=== Searching for potential long values ==="
rg -i "position['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js
rg -i "repetitionType['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js
rg -i "closeButtonAction['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js
rg -i "(?:font|background)Color['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{16,}" --type js

Length of output: 34992

backend/migrations/0006-1.0-hint.js (2)

39-39: Increasing hintContent length - that's what I'm talking about! 🔥

Good call on doubling the content field size from 1024 to 2047 chars. This allows for more detailed hint content.


19-19: Yo dawg, we need to verify these string length reductions won't cause data loss! 🍝

The changes significantly reduce the maximum length of several fields from 255 to smaller values:

  • action → 31 chars
  • tooltipPlacement → 15 chars
  • All color fields → 15 chars

Also applies to: 35-35, 47-47, 51-51, 55-55, 59-59, 63-63

✅ Verification successful

Yo dawg, these string length reductions are safe as mom's spaghetti! 🍝

The model has strict validations that prevent any values from exceeding the new limits:

  • action only allows 3 specific values, longest being 19 chars (limit: 31)
  • tooltipPlacement only accepts 4 positions, longest being 6 chars (limit: 15)
  • All color fields only accept hex colors like "#FFFFFF" - 7 chars (limit: 15)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if existing data exceeds new length limits
echo "Checking field lengths in hints table..."
cat << 'EOF' | psql
SELECT 
  CASE 
    WHEN LENGTH(action) > 31 THEN 'action: ' || action
    WHEN LENGTH(tooltipPlacement) > 15 THEN 'tooltipPlacement: ' || tooltipPlacement
    WHEN LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'headerBackgroundColor: ' || headerBackgroundColor
    WHEN LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 THEN 'headerColor: ' || headerColor
    WHEN LENGTH(textColor) > 15 THEN 'textColor: ' || textColor
    WHEN LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonBackgroundColor: ' || buttonBackgroundColor
    WHEN LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonTextColor: ' || buttonTextColor
  END as exceeded_field
FROM hints
WHERE LENGTH(action) > 31
   OR LENGTH(tooltipPlacement) > 15
   OR LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(headerColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(textColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15;
EOF

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test data and validation rules
echo "=== Searching for test data files ==="
fd -e json -e js --full-path '.*fixtures.*|.*tests.*|.*spec.*' | grep -i 'hint'

echo -e "\n=== Searching for hint-related code ==="
rg -l "hints?" --type js

echo -e "\n=== Looking for validation patterns ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'new Hint($$$)' 
ast-grep --pattern 'tooltipPlacement.*=.*' 
ast-grep --pattern 'headerBackgroundColor.*=.*'

echo -e "\n=== Checking for color patterns ==="
rg '#[0-9A-Fa-f]{3,8}' -l

Length of output: 6802


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Checking mock data and tests ==="
cat backend/src/test/mocks/hint.mock.js

echo -e "\n=== Checking model validations ==="
cat backend/src/models/Hint.js

echo -e "\n=== Checking test cases ==="
cat backend/src/test/unit/controllers/hint.test.js

Length of output: 14567

backend/migrations/0008-1.0-popup.js (2)

62-62: Content field upgrade - now we're cooking! 👨‍🍳

Good consistency with the hints table, increasing the content field to 2047 chars.


17-17: Mom's spaghetti moment - we gotta check these length reductions! 🍜

Similar to the hints table, multiple fields have reduced lengths:

  • closeButtonAction → 31 chars
  • popupSize → 15 chars
  • repetitionType → 31 chars
  • All color fields → 15 chars

Also applies to: 21-21, 33-33, 38-38, 43-43, 48-48, 53-53, 78-78

✅ Verification successful

Yo, these string length reductions are safe as mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝

After analyzing the codebase:

  • closeButtonAction: Longest value is "open url in a new tab" (19 chars < 31 limit)
  • popupSize: Uses predefined sizes like "Small"
  • Color fields: Standard hex format (#RRGGBB = 7 chars < 15 limit)
  • Frontend enforces these constraints through dropdowns
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if existing data exceeds new length limits
echo "Checking field lengths in popup table..."
cat << 'EOF' | psql
SELECT 
  CASE 
    WHEN LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 THEN 'closeButtonAction: ' || closeButtonAction
    WHEN LENGTH(popupSize) > 15 THEN 'popupSize: ' || popupSize
    WHEN LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 THEN 'repetitionType: ' || repetitionType
    WHEN LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'headerBackgroundColor: ' || headerBackgroundColor
    WHEN LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 THEN 'headerColor: ' || headerColor
    WHEN LENGTH(textColor) > 15 THEN 'textColor: ' || textColor
    WHEN LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonBackgroundColor: ' || buttonBackgroundColor
    WHEN LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonTextColor: ' || buttonTextColor
  END as exceeded_field
FROM popup
WHERE LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31
   OR LENGTH(popupSize) > 15
   OR LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31
   OR LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(headerColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(textColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15
   OR LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15;
EOF

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for enum definitions and constants related to popup fields
echo "=== Searching for popup related enums and constants ==="
rg -i "enum.*popup|popup.*enum" -g "!*.{log,lock}" -A 5

echo -e "\n=== Searching for color validation patterns ==="
rg "color.*validation|validateColor|colorPattern" -g "!*.{log,lock}"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for popup size constants ==="
rg "popupSize.*=|POPUP_SIZE|PopupSize" -g "!*.{log,lock}"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for close button actions ==="
rg "closeButtonAction.*=|CLOSE_BUTTON|ButtonAction" -g "!*.{log,lock}"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for repetition types ==="
rg "repetitionType.*=|REPETITION_TYPE|RepetitionType" -g "!*.{log,lock}"

Length of output: 16067

backend/src/models/Popup.js (1)

22-22: Rest of the model is tight, matches the migration like mom's spaghetti! 🍝

All other field changes align perfectly with the migration:

  • String length constraints match
  • Validation rules preserved
  • Default values maintained

Also applies to: 31-31, 41-41, 63-63, 73-73, 83-83, 103-103, 118-118

@erenfn erenfn merged commit 00152b3 into develop Jan 21, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
This was referenced Jan 21, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2025
9 tasks
@erenfn erenfn deleted the 504-fixes-before-1.0 branch March 5, 2025 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants