-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solves 504 #505
Solves 504 #505
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on updating database migration and model files across various tables in the backend. The changes primarily involve modifying string field lengths for different entities such as users, teams, banners, popups, hints, and tokens. Most modifications either expand or reduce the maximum character length for specific fields, with some notable increases in fields like email and banner text, and reductions in color and action-related fields. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/models/Popup.js (1)
Line range hint
93-102
: Hold up! We got an inconsistency in buttonBackgroundColor! 🤔All other color fields use
STRING(15)
, butbuttonBackgroundColor
is using justSTRING
. This should be updated for consistency.buttonBackgroundColor: { - type: DataTypes.STRING, + type: DataTypes.STRING(15), allowNull: false, defaultValue: "#FFFFFF", validate: { isHexColor(value) { validateHexColor(value, "buttonBackgroundColor"); }, }, },
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/src/models/Token.js (1)
13-13
: Hold up! That 511 character limit is sus! 🤔The token field length of 511 characters seems arbitrary. Consider using a power of 2 (512) for better memory alignment.
- type: DataTypes.STRING(511), + type: DataTypes.STRING(512),backend/src/models/Hint.js (1)
13-13
: These validations are looking clean, no spaghetti code here! 🍝The model changes align perfectly with the migration:
- String length limits match
- Validation rules are preserved
- Color validation still uses
validateHexColor
One suggestion: Consider adding a constant for the color field length (15) since it's used repeatedly.
+ const COLOR_FIELD_LENGTH = 15; // ... later in the code ... - type: DataTypes.STRING(15), // for all color fields + type: DataTypes.STRING(COLOR_FIELD_LENGTH),Also applies to: 37-37, 44-44, 54-54, 64-64, 74-74, 84-84, 94-94
jsAgent/main.js (1)
Line range hint
77-86
: Upgrade your spaghetti recipe with better ingredients! 🍝The current GUID generation using
Math.random()
isn't cryptographically secure. Consider using the moderncrypto.randomUUID()
for better uniqueness guarantees.Here's a more robust implementation:
generateGUID: function () { + if (window.crypto && crypto.randomUUID) { + return crypto.randomUUID(); + } + // Fallback for older browsers var guid = "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx".replace( /[xy]/g, function (o) { var n = (Math.random() * 16) | 0, g = o == "x" ? n : (n & 3) | 8; - return g.toSTRING(15); + return g.toString(16); } ); return guid; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/dist/index.html
is excluded by!**/dist/**
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js
(1 hunks)backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js
(1 hunks)backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js
(2 hunks)backend/migrations/0005-1.0-banner.js
(1 hunks)backend/migrations/0006-1.0-hint.js
(2 hunks)backend/migrations/0007-1.0-teams.js
(1 hunks)backend/migrations/0008-1.0-popup.js
(4 hunks)backend/src/models/Banner.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/models/HelperLink.js
(3 hunks)backend/src/models/Hint.js
(7 hunks)backend/src/models/Popup.js
(8 hunks)backend/src/models/Team.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/models/Token.js
(2 hunks)backend/src/models/User.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/service/banner.service.js
(1 hunks)backend/src/service/popup.service.js
(1 hunks)jsAgent/main.js
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.x)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
backend/src/models/Team.js (1)
11-11
: Yo dawg, let's verify this name field change won't break existing data!The name field length increase from 50 to 63 characters needs validation against existing data.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, we're good to go with that name length change! 🍝
After sweating through the codebase like it's a rap battle, I found no length validations or tests that would break with the new 63-character limit. The change looks safe to deploy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any team names that might be affected by the length change rg -l "Team.*name.*STRING.*50" backend/migrations/ # Look for any existing team names close to the old limit echo "SELECT name, LENGTH(name) as name_length FROM teams WHERE LENGTH(name) > 45 ORDER BY name_length DESC LIMIT 5;" | mysql -N guidefoxLength of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for team name validations and length checks ast-grep --pattern 'validate($$$name$$$)' backend/src/ rg -A 2 -B 2 'name.*length|length.*name' backend/src/ # Check test files for team name related tests fd -e test.js -e spec.js -X rg -l 'team.*name|name.*team' # Look for any length constants rg -i 'MAX.*NAME|NAME.*LENGTH' backend/src/Length of output: 676
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check team name test content cat backend/src/test/unit/services/team.test.js # Look for frontend validations fd -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx -X rg -l 'team.*name.*validation|validation.*team.*name' rg -A 2 -B 2 'team.*name.*length|length.*team.*name' frontend/src/Length of output: 7724
backend/src/models/Token.js (1)
26-26
: Yo, we gotta check those token types!The type field length increase to 15 characters needs validation against all possible token types.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, we're good with that token type length, fam!
After checking the codebase, the token types currently in use ('auth' and 'reset') are well within the new 15-character limit. The change is just giving us more breathing room for future token types, no issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all token type definitions and usages rg -A 1 "type.*Token" backend/src/Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find token-related files fd -t f -e js token -i # Look for any token type definitions or constants rg -i "type.*=.*['\"]" $(fd -t f -e js token -i) # Search for enum or constant definitions related to tokens rg -i "const.*token|enum.*token" $(fd -t f -e js token -i)Length of output: 490
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get content of token-related files echo "=== Token Model ===" cat backend/src/models/Token.js echo -e "\n=== Token Migration ===" cat backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js # Look for any validation or type checks rg -i "validate|check|type" backend/src/models/Token.jsLength of output: 3310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find token creation and type assignment rg -i "new token|create.*token|token.*type.*=" -A 2 # Find token imports and usage rg -i "require.*token|import.*token" -A 2Length of output: 13455
backend/src/models/User.js (1)
13-13
: These name fields be matching! That's tight! 👊Consistent 63-character limit for both name and surname fields. Nice standardization!
Also applies to: 17-17
backend/src/models/Banner.js (2)
23-23
: Color fields getting that tight constraint! 🎨15 chars for color fields is reasonable for hex codes (#RRGGBBAA), but let's verify no RGB/HSL values are used:
Also applies to: 28-28
✅ Verification successful
Color field constraint verified - all good! 🎨
The codebase consistently uses hex color codes, and there's validation in place to enforce this pattern. The named colors found are only in test mocks, likely for validation testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for color value assignments rg "fontColor.*[\"'].*[\"']|backgroundColor.*[\"'].*[\"']" backend/src/Length of output: 2865
33-33
: That banner text limit tho! 📝511 characters for banner text seems arbitrary. Consider:
- Using 512 for better memory alignment
- Verifying if this limit affects any existing banners
✅ Verification successful
Yo, about that 511 character limit! 🎯
After scanning the codebase, all banner texts are way shorter (most are under 20 chars). Bumping it to 512 would be a minor optimization, but there's no urgent need since current usage isn't anywhere near the limit.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for long banner texts echo "SELECT id, LENGTH(bannerText) as text_length FROM banners WHERE LENGTH(bannerText) > 400 ORDER BY text_length DESC LIMIT 5;" | mysql -N guidefoxLength of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for banner-related files and content echo "=== Banner-related files ===" fd -t f banner -i echo -e "\n=== Banner test data or fixtures ===" rg -i "bannertext|banner.*text" -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\n=== Migration files with banner ===" fd -e sql migration rg -i "create.*table.*banner|alter.*table.*banner" -A 5 -B 2 echo -e "\n=== Banner validation logic ===" ast-grep --pattern 'validate($$$banner$$$)'Length of output: 15292
backend/migrations/0007-1.0-teams.js (1)
17-17
: Yo dawg, we need to verify this string length change!The name field length increase to 63 characters matches the pattern seen in the users table, but we should verify that existing team names won't be truncated during migration.
Let's check for any potential data issues with this script:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, I checked it out - we're good to go with that 63-character limit!
The string length of 63 characters is consistent with the naming convention used in the users table (migration 0000). Since this is a new table creation (migration 0007) rather than a modification of existing data, there's no risk of data truncation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for team names that might be affected by the length change ast-grep --pattern 'await queryInterface.bulkInsert("teams", [{$$$}])' rg -l "teams.*name.*length.*\b[5-6][0-9]\b"Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all files related to teams echo "=== Files containing 'teams' ===" fd -t f teams echo -e "\n=== String length definitions in migrations ===" rg "STRING\([0-9]+\)" backend/migrations/ echo -e "\n=== Team-related models ===" rg -A 5 "table.*teams" backend/models/Length of output: 4365
backend/src/service/banner.service.js (1)
68-71
: Mom's spaghetti moment - this logic change needs attention!The new OR condition introduces a significant behavior change in banner visibility:
- Banners with 'show every visit' will always appear
- Banners not in the ids list will show up regardless of their repetition type
Consider these edge cases:
- What happens if ids is empty?
- Should 'show every visit' banners be tracked in the ids list at all?
Let's verify the repetition type values in use:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the spaghetti's actually pretty solid here! 🍝
After checking the codebase, the logic is legit:
- 'show every visit' and 'show only once' are the only repetition types in use
- The OR condition makes perfect sense - some banners should show every time
- Test mocks confirm this is the intended behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for all repetition type values in use rg -B 2 -A 2 "repetitionType.*['\"]show.*['\"]"Length of output: 4748
backend/migrations/0004-1.0-tokens.js (1)
17-17
: Knees weak, arms heavy - these token lengths need review!The changes raise some concerns:
- Token length of 511 is oddly specific - is this to accommodate a specific token format?
- Type field expansion to 15 chars suggests new token types might be coming
Let's check the token types in use:
Also applies to: 29-29
✅ Verification successful
Yo, these token lengths are actually pretty fly!
The token length of 511 characters and type field of 15 characters are well-justified:
- Current token types ('auth' and 'reset') fit comfortably
- Provides ample space for JWT tokens and crypto-generated reset tokens
- Future-proofs the system for additional token types
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all token type values in the codebase rg "type.*['\"][a-zA-Z_]+['\"].*token" -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find token-related files fd -t f -e js token # Look for token type definitions with broader patterns rg -i "token.*type|type.*token" -B 2 -A 2 # Search for token-related constants or enums rg "const.*token|enum.*token" -B 2 -A 2 # Check models for token definitions ast-grep --pattern 'model.define("$_Token", { $$$ })'Length of output: 48254
backend/src/models/HelperLink.js (1)
26-26
: There's vomit on his sweater already - these color fields need explanation!The increase from 7 to 15 chars for hex colors is sus:
- Standard hex colors (#RRGGBB) only need 7 chars
- Even with alpha channel (#RRGGBBAA), 9 chars is enough
Let's check if there are any non-standard color formats in use:
Also applies to: 36-36, 46-46
backend/migrations/0001-1.0-helperlink.js (1)
21-33
: Yo, we need to validate existing color values before this migration! 🎨The change from STRING(7) to STRING(15) for color fields could cause data truncation if existing values don't match hex format (#RRGGBB). Consider adding a pre-migration validation step.
Run this script to check existing color values:
backend/migrations/0000-1.0-users.js (1)
26-32
: Hold up! We need to verify these email & password length changes! 📧The changes to email (127 chars) and password (127 chars) fields need careful consideration:
- Email: While under RFC 5321 limit (254), verify if application logic validates email format
- Password: Confirm if this aligns with your password hashing algorithm's output length
Let's check the validation logic:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, these field lengths are straight fire! 🔥
The changes to both fields are solid:
- Email validation uses Express-validator's
isEmail()
- we gucci- Password field easily fits bcrypt's 60-char hash with room to grow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for email validation patterns echo "Checking email validation patterns..." rg -l "email.*valid|valid.*email" --type js # Look for password hashing implementation echo "Checking password hashing..." rg -l "password.*hash|hash.*password" --type jsLength of output: 739
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check email validation implementation echo "=== Email Validation Implementation ===" rg "email.*valid|valid.*email" backend/src/utils/auth.helper.js -A 5 -B 5 echo -e "\n=== Password Hashing Implementation ===" rg "password.*hash|hash.*password" backend/src/controllers/auth.controller.js -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 2857
backend/migrations/0005-1.0-banner.js (1)
17-45
: Mom's spaghetti moment! We need to check existing data before shrinking these fields! 🍝Several fields are being reduced significantly:
- closeButtonAction: 255 → 31
- repetitionType: 255 → 31
- position: 255 → 31
- fontColor/backgroundColor: 255 → 15
While bannerText is getting more room (511 chars), we gotta validate the shorter fields!
Let's check for potential data truncation:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, we're safe homie! These fields are locked down tighter than mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝
The validation ensures all values stay within the new limits:
- position: only accepts 'top' or 'bottom'
- closeButtonAction: strictly controlled actions
- repetitionType: fixed set of options
- colors: hex format only (#FFFFFF)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for values that would be truncated echo "Checking banner table for potential truncation..." cat << 'EOF' | psql SELECT id, CASE WHEN LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 THEN closeButtonAction END as long_action, CASE WHEN LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 THEN repetitionType END as long_type, CASE WHEN LENGTH(position) > 31 THEN position END as long_position, CASE WHEN LENGTH(fontColor) > 15 THEN fontColor END as long_font_color, CASE WHEN LENGTH(backgroundColor) > 15 THEN backgroundColor END as long_bg_color FROM banners WHERE LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 OR LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 OR LENGTH(position) > 31 OR LENGTH(fontColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(backgroundColor) > 15; EOFLength of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for banner-related test data and seeds echo "=== Searching for banner test data and seeds ===" fd -t f -e json -e js banner echo -e "\n=== Checking content of banner-related files ===" fd -t f -e json -e js banner --exec cat {} echo -e "\n=== Searching for potential long values ===" rg -i "position['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js rg -i "repetitionType['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js rg -i "closeButtonAction['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{32,}" --type js rg -i "(?:font|background)Color['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'\"]{16,}" --type jsLength of output: 34992
backend/migrations/0006-1.0-hint.js (2)
39-39
: Increasing hintContent length - that's what I'm talking about! 🔥Good call on doubling the content field size from 1024 to 2047 chars. This allows for more detailed hint content.
19-19
: Yo dawg, we need to verify these string length reductions won't cause data loss! 🍝The changes significantly reduce the maximum length of several fields from 255 to smaller values:
action
→ 31 charstooltipPlacement
→ 15 chars- All color fields → 15 chars
Also applies to: 35-35, 47-47, 51-51, 55-55, 59-59, 63-63
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, these string length reductions are safe as mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The model has strict validations that prevent any values from exceeding the new limits:
action
only allows 3 specific values, longest being 19 chars (limit: 31)tooltipPlacement
only accepts 4 positions, longest being 6 chars (limit: 15)- All color fields only accept hex colors like "#FFFFFF" - 7 chars (limit: 15)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if existing data exceeds new length limits echo "Checking field lengths in hints table..." cat << 'EOF' | psql SELECT CASE WHEN LENGTH(action) > 31 THEN 'action: ' || action WHEN LENGTH(tooltipPlacement) > 15 THEN 'tooltipPlacement: ' || tooltipPlacement WHEN LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'headerBackgroundColor: ' || headerBackgroundColor WHEN LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 THEN 'headerColor: ' || headerColor WHEN LENGTH(textColor) > 15 THEN 'textColor: ' || textColor WHEN LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonBackgroundColor: ' || buttonBackgroundColor WHEN LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonTextColor: ' || buttonTextColor END as exceeded_field FROM hints WHERE LENGTH(action) > 31 OR LENGTH(tooltipPlacement) > 15 OR LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(textColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15; EOFLength of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test data and validation rules echo "=== Searching for test data files ===" fd -e json -e js --full-path '.*fixtures.*|.*tests.*|.*spec.*' | grep -i 'hint' echo -e "\n=== Searching for hint-related code ===" rg -l "hints?" --type js echo -e "\n=== Looking for validation patterns ===" ast-grep --pattern 'new Hint($$$)' ast-grep --pattern 'tooltipPlacement.*=.*' ast-grep --pattern 'headerBackgroundColor.*=.*' echo -e "\n=== Checking for color patterns ===" rg '#[0-9A-Fa-f]{3,8}' -lLength of output: 6802
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Checking mock data and tests ===" cat backend/src/test/mocks/hint.mock.js echo -e "\n=== Checking model validations ===" cat backend/src/models/Hint.js echo -e "\n=== Checking test cases ===" cat backend/src/test/unit/controllers/hint.test.jsLength of output: 14567
backend/migrations/0008-1.0-popup.js (2)
62-62
: Content field upgrade - now we're cooking! 👨🍳Good consistency with the hints table, increasing the content field to 2047 chars.
17-17
: Mom's spaghetti moment - we gotta check these length reductions! 🍜Similar to the hints table, multiple fields have reduced lengths:
closeButtonAction
→ 31 charspopupSize
→ 15 charsrepetitionType
→ 31 chars- All color fields → 15 chars
Also applies to: 21-21, 33-33, 38-38, 43-43, 48-48, 53-53, 78-78
✅ Verification successful
Yo, these string length reductions are safe as mom's spaghetti recipe! 🍝
After analyzing the codebase:
closeButtonAction
: Longest value is "open url in a new tab" (19 chars < 31 limit)popupSize
: Uses predefined sizes like "Small"- Color fields: Standard hex format (#RRGGBB = 7 chars < 15 limit)
- Frontend enforces these constraints through dropdowns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if existing data exceeds new length limits echo "Checking field lengths in popup table..." cat << 'EOF' | psql SELECT CASE WHEN LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 THEN 'closeButtonAction: ' || closeButtonAction WHEN LENGTH(popupSize) > 15 THEN 'popupSize: ' || popupSize WHEN LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 THEN 'repetitionType: ' || repetitionType WHEN LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'headerBackgroundColor: ' || headerBackgroundColor WHEN LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 THEN 'headerColor: ' || headerColor WHEN LENGTH(textColor) > 15 THEN 'textColor: ' || textColor WHEN LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonBackgroundColor: ' || buttonBackgroundColor WHEN LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15 THEN 'buttonTextColor: ' || buttonTextColor END as exceeded_field FROM popup WHERE LENGTH(closeButtonAction) > 31 OR LENGTH(popupSize) > 15 OR LENGTH(repetitionType) > 31 OR LENGTH(headerBackgroundColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(headerColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(textColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(buttonBackgroundColor) > 15 OR LENGTH(buttonTextColor) > 15; EOFLength of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for enum definitions and constants related to popup fields echo "=== Searching for popup related enums and constants ===" rg -i "enum.*popup|popup.*enum" -g "!*.{log,lock}" -A 5 echo -e "\n=== Searching for color validation patterns ===" rg "color.*validation|validateColor|colorPattern" -g "!*.{log,lock}" echo -e "\n=== Searching for popup size constants ===" rg "popupSize.*=|POPUP_SIZE|PopupSize" -g "!*.{log,lock}" echo -e "\n=== Searching for close button actions ===" rg "closeButtonAction.*=|CLOSE_BUTTON|ButtonAction" -g "!*.{log,lock}" echo -e "\n=== Searching for repetition types ===" rg "repetitionType.*=|REPETITION_TYPE|RepetitionType" -g "!*.{log,lock}"Length of output: 16067
backend/src/models/Popup.js (1)
22-22
: Rest of the model is tight, matches the migration like mom's spaghetti! 🍝All other field changes align perfectly with the migration:
- String length constraints match
- Validation rules preserved
- Default values maintained
Also applies to: 31-31, 41-41, 63-63, 73-73, 83-83, 103-103, 118-118
Solves #504