Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add OSSF Scorecard #5405

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from
Open

test: add OSSF Scorecard #5405

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Mar 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced an automated workflow that performs supply-chain security analysis. This enhancement triggers on scheduled events and key code updates, ensuring that security scanning results are automatically generated and integrated with the code scanning dashboard for enhanced visibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file designed to perform supply-chain security analysis using the Scorecard tool. The workflow triggers on branch protection events, pushes to the "next" and "master" branches, and via a cron schedule every Monday at 18:37 UTC. It checks out the code, executes the analysis, uploads artifacts, and optionally publishes the results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard, with specific permission and retention configurations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml Added a new workflow for supply-chain security analysis: triggers on branch protection, scheduled cron, and pushes; runs Scorecard analysis; uploads artifacts; optionally publishes results to the code scanning dashboard.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant E as Event Trigger (branch, push, cron)
    participant W as Workflow Runner (Ubuntu)
    participant C as Code Checkout
    participant S as Scorecard Analysis
    participant A as Artifact Uploader
    participant P as Scanning Publisher

    E->>W: Trigger workflow
    W->>C: Checkout repository
    W->>S: Run Scorecard analysis
    S->>A: Generate SARIF report and upload
    A->>W: Confirm upload
    alt Publish Enabled
        S->>P: Publish results to code scanning dashboard
    end
Loading

Poem

I'm a coding rabbit, quick and keen,
Hopping through workflows, a sight to be seen.
Scorecard hops in to check our chain,
Uploading reports while I nibble on grain.
A secure code garden, where bugs refrain,
Hooray for progress—let's cheer again!
🐰🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a48cfaa and 4a305c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Scorecard analysis
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (10)

1-4: Third-Party Action Disclaimer:

The introductory comments clearly warn users that actions used here are not officially certified by GitHub. This is a good security precaution. Please ensure that any third-party actions are periodically reviewed for vulnerabilities.


5-5: Workflow Naming: Clear and Descriptive

The workflow name "Scorecard supply-chain security" immediately informs users of its purpose.


6-18: Workflow Triggers: Comprehensive Event Coverage

The workflow is triggered on multiple events including branch protection rules, a scheduled cron job, push events, and pull requests. This multi-trigger setup helps ensure timely and consistent security analysis.

Note: Verify that the branch_protection_rule event is fully supported in your repository environment, as its behavior may differ based on repository settings.


19-20: Default Permissions: Minimal by Design

Setting default permissions to read-all follows the principle of least privilege, reducing the risk of unintended modifications.


22-34: Job Configuration: Secure and Well-Scoped

The "Scorecard analysis" job is configured to run on ubuntu-latest with job-level permissions set appropriately:

  • security-events: write allows uploading of results.
  • id-token: write is needed for publishing.

The commented-out optional permissions for private repositories provide useful guidance for adapting this workflow, if needed.


35-40: Checkout Step: Best Practices in Action

The checkout step uses a pinned commit (actions/checkout@b4ffde65f46336ab88eb53be808477a3936bae11) to enhance stability and security. The option persist-credentials: false further strengthens credential handling.


41-51: Scorecard Analysis Step: Clear and Configurable

The "Run analysis" step leverages the ossf/scorecard-action with clearly defined parameters for output:

  • Results are written to results.sarif in SARIF format.
  • Detailed comments guide users on how to optionally enable a PAT token for enhanced functionality.

Ensure that the pinned version (ossf/scorecard-action@0864cf19026789058feabb7e87baa5f140aac736) meets your project’s security and functionality requirements.


52-60: Publishing Settings: Well Explained

The configuration block explains the implications for public versus private repositories. Setting publish_results: true is appropriate for public repositories to facilitate the Scorecard badge and OpenSSF API integration.


61-69: Artifact Upload Step: Properly Configured

Uploading the SARIF file as an artifact with a 5-day retention period helps in preserving analysis results while managing storage efficiently.


70-75: Upload to Code-Scanning: Seamless Integration

The final step uploads results to GitHub’s Code Scanning dashboard using the github/codeql-action/upload-sarif action. Ensure that Code Scanning is enabled in your repository for this integration to function as expected.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (3)

1-4: Third-Party Actions Disclaimer
The disclaimer clearly informs users about the use of non-certified third-party actions and directs them to separate terms, privacy, and support documentation. Ensure that the referenced policies stay updated as the third-party services evolve.


17-18: Default Permissions Setting
The default permissions are set to read-all. While this may be intended to enforce a read-only policy, please double-check that this value produces the desired effect since GitHub Actions typically use read for read-only access.


39-49: Scorecard Analysis Step Examination
The analysis step is well configured to generate a SARIF-formatted results file using a pinned version of the Scorecard action. Consider uncommenting and configuring the repo_token parameter when authentication enhancements are needed (e.g., for a private repository or public repositories requiring an authenticated branch-protection check).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d5031e and a48cfaa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (5)

5-16: Workflow Trigger Configuration
The workflow is configured to trigger on branch protection events, a weekly schedule (cron), and pushes to the "next" and "master" branches. Please verify that the branch_protection_rule event is supported and that its configuration meets your repository’s requirements.


20-32: Job-Level Permissions Configuration
The job-level permissions (i.e., security-events: write and id-token: write) are specified correctly, and the commented lines provide useful guidance for private repositories. This configuration appears sound.


33-38: Checkout Step Configuration
The checkout step uses a pinned commit for actions/checkout and disables credential persistence, which is aligned with security best practices.


59-67: Artifact Upload Configuration
The step to upload the SARIF file as an artifact (with a retention of 5 days) is correctly configured. Confirm that the retention period aligns with your artifact storage policies.


68-73: Code Scanning Upload Step
The configuration for uploading the SARIF report to GitHub's code scanning dashboard using the CodeQL action is appropriate. Ensure that the SARIF report generated by the earlier steps conforms to GitHub’s expected format for seamless integration into the dashboard.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.91%. Comparing base (8e433d9) to head (4a305c7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on next.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #5405   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.91%   94.91%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3774     3774           
  Branches      352      352           
=======================================
  Hits         3582     3582           
  Misses        192      192           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant