-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve hash functionality #457
Conversation
@JSCU-CNI a heads-up there will be a change in what the record format will look like. To make it clearer which field belongs to what digest |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #457 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.87% 73.88% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 259 259
Lines 20893 20901 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 15434 15442 +8
Misses 5459 5459
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thanks for the heads-up @Miauwkeru. |
54ec149
to
32cba04
Compare
Add `<field_name>_resolved` and `<field_name>_digest` to the record for every resolvable path inside that record. (DIS-2623)
Add `<field_name>_resolved` and `<field_name>_digest` to the record for every resolvable path inside that record. (DIS-2623)
Add `<field_name>_resolved` and `<field_name>_digest` to the record for every resolvable path inside that record. (DIS-2623)
(DIS-2623)