You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like some users are using an XPath expression in order to store the form version as a form field, in order to access the form version during later data management/analysis: https://forum.getodk.org/t/tracing-the-propagation-of-different-versions-of-same-form/34824/3. I think it'd be helpful if we automatically added the form version as a column in the submissions CSV file and as a property in the OData response. There wouldn't be filtering on form version (form version isn't a column on the submissions table, so I think it might be hard to add filtering).
I don't remember whether a single submission can be associated with multiple form versions (if the submission is edited). When we export submissions, we export the latest submission version, so I think we should use the form version associated with the latest submission version (then probably document that in the API docs).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like some users are using an XPath expression in order to store the form version as a form field, in order to access the form version during later data management/analysis: https://forum.getodk.org/t/tracing-the-propagation-of-different-versions-of-same-form/34824/3. I think it'd be helpful if we automatically added the form version as a column in the submissions CSV file and as a property in the OData response. There wouldn't be filtering on form version (form version isn't a column on the
submissions
table, so I think it might be hard to add filtering).I don't remember whether a single submission can be associated with multiple form versions (if the submission is edited). When we export submissions, we export the latest submission version, so I think we should use the form version associated with the latest submission version (then probably document that in the API docs).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: