Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use EpochSubgraph to fetch block numbers instead of EpochManager #573

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 20, 2023

Conversation

tilacog
Copy link
Contributor

@tilacog tilacog commented Jan 13, 2023

@tilacog tilacog requested a review from fordN January 13, 2023 16:44
@tilacog tilacog changed the title Use EpochSubgraph to fetch block numbers _(instead of EpochManager)_ Use EpochSubgraph to fetch block numbers instead of EpochManager Jan 13, 2023
@tilacog tilacog marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2023 22:32
Copy link
Contributor

@fordN fordN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! 👍

@fordN fordN force-pushed the tiago/use-epoch-subgraph-for-epoch-block-numbers branch from 0537d47 to 4ae2257 Compare January 17, 2023 17:22
@tilacog tilacog requested a review from fordN January 18, 2023 22:58
Copy link
Contributor

@fordN fordN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@tilacog
Copy link
Contributor Author

tilacog commented Jan 18, 2023

Rebasing to remove Dockerfile-related commits

@tilacog tilacog force-pushed the tiago/use-epoch-subgraph-for-epoch-block-numbers branch from 3ebf6e3 to 85498ad Compare January 18, 2023 23:12
@tilacog tilacog merged commit bcff583 into main Jan 20, 2023
@tilacog tilacog deleted the tiago/use-epoch-subgraph-for-epoch-block-numbers branch January 20, 2023 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🚗 Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants